IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] FW: New Version Notification for draft-howard-homenet-routing-comparison-00.txt

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 20 January 2012 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E77921F853C for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:19:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5AenTBShoD8 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F337B21F8539 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE54E2CC44; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5G3Bbrxi5yMy; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6576F2CC39; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4F1977FE.4070709@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:19:42 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111220 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
References: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD46569377917370FC937@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD46569377917370FC937@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] FW: New Version Notification for draft-howard-homenet-routing-comparison-00.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:19:44 -0000

Many thanks for writing the draft(s)!

> In particular, I have no knowledge of MANEMO or RPL, so I can't evaluate them. MANEMO probably shouldn't be here, since there isn't even a draft to point to. 

I think you can delete the MANEMO part. MANEMO was loose collection of ideas roughly in the same direction as your PIO proposal.

For RPL, IS-IS, etc. you'll find that you have to come up with some additional ideas on how the other aspects of the home network are handled, not just the pure routing part. (For this reason, it might actually be useful to break down the analysis a bit. For the pure routing part, PIO-RIP-OSPFAC differ in such and such ways. The mechanisms for border detection are A-B-C and they differ in these other ways. Etc.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email