RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Wed, 16 March 2016 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689AE12D968 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjvuqxBLj0Hg for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D0C12D96F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1agBkq-0003ED-3t for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:44:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:44:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1agBkq-0003ED-3t@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1agBkj-00039I-P9 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:44:45 +0000
Received: from giant.haxx.se ([80.67.6.50] ident=root) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1agBkd-0001hx-35 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:44:43 +0000
Received: from giant.haxx.se (dast@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPS id u2GDi9fw020644 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:44:09 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2GDi867020639; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:44:08 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:44:08 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "amankin@verisign.com" <amankin@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D486E0089@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603161441030.26615@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <1C279539-57D5-4624-A80A-0344565872DF@mnot.net> <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D486E0089@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.6.50; envelope-from=daniel@haxx.se; helo=giant.haxx.se
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1agBkd-0001hx-35 c2bd906098362bf2ea4dba7da13422bc
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.DEB.2.20.1603161441030.26615@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31278
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) wrote:

> The document refers to several TCPM RFCs with experimental status, e.g., in 
> Section 3. That may have to be taken into account when heading towards BCP 
> status.

Several? I can only find one reference, and that is to Tail Loss Probe in a 
section that is still to be written/ripped out.

Does anyone have any particular advice when it comes to tail loss and HTTP/TCP 
that we should put there?

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se