IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> Wed, 02 March 2016 08:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853AB1A8AE2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:28:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgWrl4QWFAtN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1221A8AE1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 00:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ab24z-0007Ql-77 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:24:21 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:24:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ab24z-0007Ql-77@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ab24u-0007NS-Mp for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:24:16 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <cory@lukasa.co.uk>) id 1ab24p-00040x-9H for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:24:13 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l68so68880193wml.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:23:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lukasa-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=GI1ACSKJpTqnIBkrexGh39ZPYgXQZkNI1JPvS7loykE=; b=uVc7mQKsq6TC9Gn5pgeSfSg+3wCxmTn2JA3ShUx4SN90Z82NfjXBgoYxwkmXO7vspb 5FjN6r6FEKul14s5HR7dXELXZEnUnTo2LKYK4+dO0vF8C5V9Yc7SrHCNZPN9x7o4F8C1 WK5+E4XhiTqkYNF6PosFsJm78axqB8Q269ppVbLCgcedcUlIauvwga/VkEx+9E9mXhpv nH20nn9D4lbJBWBxI0E3Dag6sHZcWA4WfzFq2sz5r5Csecfm2Wt0m6s62Ep92d/XJNsq WQmISNazKKzpkCszdCJMiQPTanaApMfw6z//ZmcV72os5BNSEU1iphtw0hp74RJnNh8v Aj9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=GI1ACSKJpTqnIBkrexGh39ZPYgXQZkNI1JPvS7loykE=; b=UftgNnwcfL9YuXVtt0eWJHpvJhbyRR5bUuh7gHJLN0wmXHvqWsTDmLfn3YvqqHUZcz FgvWm+c5NN+T++680TAvBvNuu+wR9kNr0mNgFE8JaR+wl3LTKvQQiwOw8Ukf7+Ht0JuE oab1/7t5e/bY5VWUqiljib/kwd6HOQGJ86gDa/asNozfWPQJkpur7doIt7sj34wLOsn7 EOPTORAbx/qixF2uUZWicgaLgnO15HCmgUTMBICf6aRYB1SHS7jLbl/lCiL++hxWhi+7 xZLOGEO1TWKN2vfESxA4bdfEteoIcpgJL7eq1aRJ9/jUT20kxr+iW1MsoF9jeJUNxeBa 9scw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLZ9p1AlQnWtvzwnaeRFj54Q3DVlz0tvYG+k1yUVpGDyACA9DBsNeqQOyrEuRW2iQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.54.229 with SMTP id y98mr3369040wmh.89.1456907024249; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (157.4.198.146.dyn.plus.net. [146.198.4.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm34766857wjz.11.2016.03.02.00.23.43 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3120\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C9DCE400-0C45-4558-BA5C-2C6B4932BC04"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1C279539-57D5-4624-A80A-0344565872DF@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:23:40 +0000
Cc: HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, amankin@verisign.com, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Message-Id: <B4DCF600-D32D-4126-BFF9-DCDC945DF46D@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <1C279539-57D5-4624-A80A-0344565872DF@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3120)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.50; envelope-from=cory@lukasa.co.uk; helo=mail-wm0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ab24p-00040x-9H 8f3206dc0f66b4e8fda6ba73ff33f8e0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/B4DCF600-D32D-4126-BFF9-DCDC945DF46D@lukasa.co.uk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31142
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I support adopting this with a target of BCP.

Cory

> On 2 Mar 2016, at 05:46, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> [ copying Alison as our Transport Tech Advisor ]
> 
> Daniel has kindly started a document about how HTTP uses TCP, both for /1 and /2:
>  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stenberg-httpbis-tcp>
> 
> We haven't explicitly discussed this at a meeting, but I have heard interest in this topic from a variety of folks.
> 
> What do people think about adopting this with a target of Best Current Practice?
> 
> Please comment on-list.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email