IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 04 March 2016 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62691A8766 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:44:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lq4HxZSUN_mh for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053B91A8768 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1abudH-0004vv-Vv for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:39:24 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:39:23 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1abudH-0004vv-Vv@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1abudD-0004vA-2m for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:39:19 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1abudA-0003xu-T1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:39:18 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id u24IcdET030844; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:38:39 +0100
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 19:38:39 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20160304183839.GA30841@1wt.eu>
References: <56D74C23.5010705@isi.edu> <56D76A7E.7090507@isi.edu> <20160302232125.GA18275@1wt.eu> <56D77892.2000308@isi.edu> <20160303065545.GA18412@1wt.eu> <56D87BAC.4060204@isi.edu> <20160303184418.GA18774@1wt.eu> <CAOdDvNokUDxmfy87VrQNLoQvQknP6L3h6fLbuFeVpOiDN4szAQ@mail.gmail.com> <56D9D235.9000106@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56D9D235.9000106@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.926, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1abudA-0003xu-T1 d3d216b3bf5995c55a2312da2dea4026
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20160304183839.GA30841@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31181
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:21:41AM -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
> IMO, the doc in its current form is no better than the kind of advice
> that can be found on Google.

The fact that it was written by one of the members of this WG, and
the fact that there are several supporters for its adoption tend to
indicate that some people here find more value in this document than
on random links found on Google. And don't please forget that the
links I sent you recommending to solve issues the absolute worst way
were the first ones reported by Google.

Willy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email