IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Sun, 06 March 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685101A017F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 07:27:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7S41Zitakrz0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 07:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03C51A017C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 07:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1acaV6-00084k-0f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:21:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:21:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1acaV6-00084k-0f@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1acaV0-00083z-9g for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:21:38 +0000
Received: from giant.haxx.se ([80.67.6.50] ident=root) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <daniel@haxx.se>) id 1acaUw-0004qG-Mk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:21:37 +0000
Received: from giant.haxx.se (dast@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPS id u26FL7UI026907 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:21:07 +0100
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u26FL6ov026902; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:21:07 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 16:21:06 +0100
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "amankin@verisign.com" <amankin@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B9B48179856DC4FA00C93C79EB7E64A60C7D07A@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1603061615410.13440@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <1C279539-57D5-4624-A80A-0344565872DF@mnot.net> <2B9B48179856DC4FA00C93C79EB7E64A60C7D07A@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.6.50; envelope-from=daniel@haxx.se; helo=giant.haxx.se
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.690, BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1acaUw-0004qG-Mk 752e3ca24c8d8a7087a3b29f112e41cd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.DEB.2.20.1603061615410.13440@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31200
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Salvatore Loreto wrote:

> I definitely support this as BCP
>
> I would love to see more focus on the mobile aspects especially the one 
> requiring different consideration and configuration Not sure the worth to 
> distinguish between mobile wifi and cellular

(as writer of the draft in the subject)

If you can come up with specific suggestions for how to do that, I'll be all 
ears.

The flood of responses in this thread is excellent I think and truly shows 
that a document such as this could be useful. I've spent most of this week on 
skiis so I haven't really been able to respond to to suggestions and 
questions, but I hope to address some of those in the next few days.

But as always: please suggest your improvements or additions on-list and I'll 
try to collect them and make another version available soon.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email