IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 08 March 2016 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2196012DC0C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOIza-zi9eDr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0BF12DC05 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1adQkp-0005NL-MF for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:09:27 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:09:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1adQkp-0005NL-MF@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <touch@isi.edu>) id 1adQkk-0005Lq-8E for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:09:22 +0000
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <touch@isi.edu>) id 1adQki-0001Be-Pl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:09:21 +0000
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u28N7tc2023268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:07:56 -0800 (PST)
To: Leif Hedstrom <leif@ogre.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
References: <1C279539-57D5-4624-A80A-0344565872DF@mnot.net> <7DE0D70B-2969-482D-AE5F-51213726B8B7@ogre.com> <56DCE281.5030804@treenet.co.nz> <75BA73E5-0936-42F1-9FC1-795AE9D0DE8E@ogre.com>
Cc: touch@isi.edu, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <56DF5B4B.4010500@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:07:55 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <75BA73E5-0936-42F1-9FC1-795AE9D0DE8E@ogre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Received-SPF: none client-ip=128.9.64.64; envelope-from=touch@isi.edu; helo=vapor.isi.edu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1adQki-0001Be-Pl e04640eede4c4dbdb11f89966a9fd01c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56DF5B4B.4010500@isi.edu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31230
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>


On 3/8/2016 2:48 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> That much said, that might turn it into a difficult document to read. In
> the end, what many people need is a single sysctl.conf (etc.) file to
> deploy. :-).


That is not the purpose of RFCs.

That is the purpose of manual pages.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email