IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 04 March 2016 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5641A8796 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:51:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_HQbUx2vTgA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF581A878C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1abukm-0003nL-BJ for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:47:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:47:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1abukm-0003nL-BJ@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <touch@isi.edu>) id 1abukh-0003mE-QN for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:47:03 +0000
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <touch@isi.edu>) id 1abukd-0004Bn-Pq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:47:01 +0000
Received: from [128.9.184.212] ([128.9.184.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u24Ijl4c005706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:45:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
References: <56D74C23.5010705@isi.edu> <56D76A7E.7090507@isi.edu> <20160302232125.GA18275@1wt.eu> <56D77892.2000308@isi.edu> <20160303065545.GA18412@1wt.eu> <56D87BAC.4060204@isi.edu> <20160303184418.GA18774@1wt.eu> <CAOdDvNokUDxmfy87VrQNLoQvQknP6L3h6fLbuFeVpOiDN4szAQ@mail.gmail.com> <56D9D235.9000106@isi.edu> <20160304183839.GA30841@1wt.eu>
Cc: touch@isi.edu, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <56D9D7D8.8070705@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:45:44 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160304183839.GA30841@1wt.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Received-SPF: none client-ip=128.9.160.161; envelope-from=touch@isi.edu; helo=boreas.isi.edu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1abukd-0004Bn-Pq c1b120744626b8ecd12f7163bb6d7dfb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [tcpm] FW: Call for Adoption: TCP Tuning for HTTP
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/56D9D7D8.8070705@isi.edu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31182
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3/4/2016 10:38 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:21:41AM -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
>> IMO, the doc in its current form is no better than the kind of advice
>> that can be found on Google.
> 
> The fact that it was written by one of the members of this WG, and
> the fact that there are several supporters for its adoption tend to
> indicate that some people here find more value in this document than
> on random links found on Google. 

The value would be in exploring the literature on the subject of
designing large servers.

And don't forget that some people also find value in those links, so
community interest isn't necessarily a gauge of quality.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email