IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 13 February 2017 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C8112947C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:29:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3AYo5FxBixY for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B7712940E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cd99A-0002Mm-CD for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:25:56 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:25:56 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cd99A-0002Mm-CD@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cd993-0002Lv-SB for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:25:49 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cd98x-0008Jm-J8 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:25:44 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3898322E1F3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:25:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:25:18 +1100
References: <C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net>
Message-Id: <D93092A2-9552-4514-B46C-4FA3A9056E38@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.319, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cd98x-0008Jm-J8 3c903bf1fca41af1cd31e9a04f47a306
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/D93092A2-9552-4514-B46C-4FA3A9056E38@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33476
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

After discussion and some more edits, it *seems* like people like this direction, so I'm going to merge the pull and issue another draft, so that a wider audience can have a look. Consider the next draft an editors' proposal for what I think can gain consensus.

Cheers,


> On 1 Feb 2017, at 5:50 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> [ editor hat ]
> 
> After talking to a few people, I have a few suggested changes in a pull request:
>  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/285/files
> 
> Basically, this:
>  - Removes the requirement for a supporting client to check DNS to determine if the server is authoritative, when ORIGIN is received
>  - Redefines the initial Origin Set as whatever SNI included (if anything).
> 
> I suspect some adjustments will need to be made, but I wanted to get some feedback on the ideas first.
> 
> Some people have also been talking about simplifying ORIGIN, e.g., by removing some of the set operations. I think we should talk about that on list first.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email