IETF Logo Mail Archive

ORIGIN - suggested changes

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EC5120727 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbBT3kITHmjn for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0CF3129964 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cYokd-0002K4-75 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:50:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:50:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cYokd-0002K4-75@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cYokX-0002J9-LM for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:50:37 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1cYokR-0002me-M0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:50:32 +0000
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.98.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EA6122E1F3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 01:50:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:50:05 +1100
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.946, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cYokR-0002me-M0 7c0e11dde1c6456747ac5028e60a466f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: ORIGIN - suggested changes
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33405
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

[ editor hat ]

After talking to a few people, I have a few suggested changes in a pull request:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/285/files

Basically, this:
  - Removes the requirement for a supporting client to check DNS to determine if the server is authoritative, when ORIGIN is received
  - Redefines the initial Origin Set as whatever SNI included (if anything).

I suspect some adjustments will need to be made, but I wanted to get some feedback on the ideas first.

Some people have also been talking about simplifying ORIGIN, e.g., by removing some of the set operations. I think we should talk about that on list first.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email