IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8BA1295C6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:22:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1fvcCEQ3Lph for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26551295C5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cZ3F5-0002gp-El for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:19:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:19:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cZ3F5-0002gp-El@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cZ3F1-0002ec-Vi for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:19:04 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cZ3Et-0006eP-GU for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:18:58 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w20so215551458qtb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:18:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W6IKT0UDifB6/a3OkNHUae3ZSJlyyV7iJRResNRIANU=; b=FN5poHgMSF6Uo3NCijVnKJ1WbZk5XYjxskri9tyU/DvcR0utXKqeif24mSO7NT9wBb EBpxMCVXVsmiALnmq+j7XCIOUYXkFJGWfyaW2EHQNUW1THNMrsObjIZWjcnOidd/ffyd k1Ph0crBC0qtzZe9XIwDVniLqSZxgrcBJSxusPZJzdVrNDF9XjHRs/FYBh9sBw1mvJL6 Y2I7055k5Wfz1XHyzMPg84xbd38gIqfeqZLEhmrqrqZIsz75YxVh9J23H3dSh7i/88cl npFJlbLoH4epDh3vzTij4xn99Uy+1gWz6WXFoWB43Okhl8TQNxwSapV6R5MmE4XhLdLv k7ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W6IKT0UDifB6/a3OkNHUae3ZSJlyyV7iJRResNRIANU=; b=Gc73BV04/Y7mRtRq7fxTrv/bLz0G6HZ933E8xY5A2W4F3TJR3WXSHPcNEr21bajWr9 whutxrNl+C2KOrEcyNknAg6lV7gaNva7jUOH6jDToYT0uerYjc/11wO7DZitKMKM0gqS OmHIMN+trHk4hZfN+0lLa7J6cmBfxk/FTzRvMQp6IOBuh418AN30H5fUIqeyikGtMxp6 okr7tpGymVIkjC9+/G6mXNmp4Hsl00ZTi2vHsZREO5GM2dGtakIwpRsz7kbhVcu5gl5z biMcrh0i2+8BdZFFG+TC31KyALB67Oya/qxrUqHVAkFUglbZIYXCmrHX71i63qmrJmVI eTww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKn7f7hJssJH3nrVKCNX5uRBzzA2pZwi51on2NyrDC630xy/SF3PkP11BEs1ATOohvig9BgJKLaEfgr7w==
X-Received: by 10.200.39.200 with SMTP id x8mr4967059qtx.159.1485987507796; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:18:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:18:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAM8YLWn6Q7UhwfVoG7LT+-hyf5dBEOpnQds17BiXwq3NXYb0uw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net> <CABkgnnWaN6Kaq28=a+At_YQcZmG_o0-VRMAWBABzdLz-RBxxPA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8YLWn6Q7UhwfVoG7LT+-hyf5dBEOpnQds17BiXwq3NXYb0uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 09:18:27 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUU1cs0MDDPXuStpLtrCCJ4LuYaz-qkUaWe_riK9HA01g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.178; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.127, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cZ3Et-0006eP-GU 0880d8a5f9e0bf2fc4f59dac54add7a2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnUU1cs0MDDPXuStpLtrCCJ4LuYaz-qkUaWe_riK9HA01g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33415
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2 February 2017 at 03:46, Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com> wrote:
> +    The TLS implementation MUST support the Server Name Indication (SNI)
> +    [TLS-EXT] extension to TLS.  HTTP/2 clients MUST indicate the target
>
> I've seen HTTP/2 servers reject the connection if the client doesn't send an
> SNI.

My memory was clearly faulty.  Mark's "if anything" comment lead me to
infer that SNI was optional.  As it isn't, this isn't a problem.  The
point about coalescing stands.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email