Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes

Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B2C12944B for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:52:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTPVMMd8y2Vy for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0973D12944A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cdojw-0005hF-5u for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:50:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:50:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cdojw-0005hF-5u@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <fdeweerdt@fastly.com>) id 1cdojq-0005gD-HB for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:50:34 +0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <fdeweerdt@fastly.com>) id 1cdojk-00057W-6e for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:50:29 +0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u68so75520164ywg.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:50:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lp31x9rf7/RF5j0Vy/p2XuDYksgh/VcI0026R2e/5ms=; b=Piz19gHlqctZ0L3TkqBIcw3U/oU+Efn2LHzN0VZrlMPTkOViQUVa1pLUskebw1yHCC H/DvvtXIFrPIhJuKse42qm+1ybdysXWslXCsCoR+bC96v9KJ04gpogbYJopKDIMQb5JF CjjYzifIwFMaivz7goR21pGY6z5GGL0ORd8fM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lp31x9rf7/RF5j0Vy/p2XuDYksgh/VcI0026R2e/5ms=; b=kf/rG0mmMUh7Wg/Qu2PB56QJuI+/wfTRpX3HALfUtZqVAdtlPkkORAvHztcVI1UdVj SDn2+cAOsyAHcPBoRZ/aA6oCbnuxfZ0fiixX7nMUWH8PmOnlqwDtDA7DgjjttSsH/uaj 6bM4yuXFRMxWa402blwOHXfIDHXq+Ag+1YgZQDkKMWxB8sbrthhnFcSMQYGAOwDQCVle K+6aK7blSWCkAlTb55/T7E9tDxqvX3Xffa4SKKyfFlCikN1XUJVYute+DrqdkcNs0yCo rDbLMtDqojJzYK77r+m96y8zydyn/jNmjqEpqRe+wgBwJPx1U2twW1nIHVEsJlyxSTN4 MmRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lZi4cK6GVAm5g4SHSOK1iuL6vW90WC/OCvdjsT2AuA/TVOsT71j4CEBg9WTud7BgNgJv+OkA4Drc01lWk9
X-Received: by 10.129.173.10 with SMTP id l10mr23964482ywh.175.1487123401934; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:50:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.160.87 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:50:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D93092A2-9552-4514-B46C-4FA3A9056E38@mnot.net>
References: <C3CCA267-F5B5-4827-AC27-9853BDADACDE@mnot.net> <D93092A2-9552-4514-B46C-4FA3A9056E38@mnot.net>
From: Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:50:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM8YLW=u6xhkfFPJNw07vPwqYjNECVpEAt81BskwJdHb3RSkJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f6e221c3cd5054887e67a
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.161.176; envelope-from=fdeweerdt@fastly.com; helo=mail-yw0-f176.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cdojk-00057W-6e e90bf9cb150e7b4551fc17db8ddbac42
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAM8YLW=u6xhkfFPJNw07vPwqYjNECVpEAt81BskwJdHb3RSkJA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33518
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello,

The implementation for H2O is being worked on here:
https://github.com/h2o/h2o/pull/1199. It's in a state that might be useful
for integration testing.

Frederik

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> After discussion and some more edits, it *seems* like people like this
> direction, so I'm going to merge the pull and issue another draft, so that
> a wider audience can have a look. Consider the next draft an editors'
> proposal for what I think can gain consensus.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 1 Feb 2017, at 5:50 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> >
> > [ editor hat ]
> >
> > After talking to a few people, I have a few suggested changes in a pull
> request:
> >  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/285/files
> >
> > Basically, this:
> >  - Removes the requirement for a supporting client to check DNS to
> determine if the server is authoritative, when ORIGIN is received
> >  - Redefines the initial Origin Set as whatever SNI included (if
> anything).
> >
> > I suspect some adjustments will need to be made, but I wanted to get
> some feedback on the ideas first.
> >
> > Some people have also been talking about simplifying ORIGIN, e.g., by
> removing some of the set operations. I think we should talk about that on
> list first.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>