IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net> Wed, 27 February 2013 10:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A7721F8511 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:19:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEhIuPEJqWDV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7364221F850F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UAe57-000155-IA for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UAe57-000155-IA@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1UAe4x-0000kg-FO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:39 +0000
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1UAe4w-0005ec-Ln for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:39 +0000
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org>) id 1UAe4u-00062d-0T for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:17:36 +0100
Received: from 192.196.142.20 ([192.196.142.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:17:36 +0100
Received: from nicolas.mailhot by 192.196.142.20 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:17:36 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:16:55 +0000
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <loom.20130227T111123-907@post.gmane.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com> <A6A82B6EF92590887D2A23D5@cyrus.local> <D9118B58-F53F-4F75-8292-2B990172E234@opengroupware.org> <CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNeWDBTBYJ0P-URbO5avbUno5etKid10RM+dRwDWAUys2w@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfVvZnYPPsRvzmC0BtCiPBxQmYXHTRKtq8XE7Z2wY2EfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYioRAOEbjU32yEaJuWDAySiZF=OfKXcF-8esqTP0uqwtQ@mail.gmail.com> <968F329C-B6CF-4129-B816-DC56C834A4A4@opengroupware.org> <CAA4WUYgGiJmtbswzmXWi-Ob+1HmoGnMhwr+9j9b5KS5OVQQdjQ@mail.gmail.com> <2DA0834D-C0B7-4A26-B6AD-B5789D0CFA3B@opengroupware.org> <999F9463-660A-42FC-A11C-39CDE95CC616@mnot.net> <D70BFCAB-D2C1-4C66-994F-0C53F6C66581@opengroupware.org> <CABP7RbeiwjGXSO2F4BAc-MjnpRRzBddzP4Sm=Z15meaODQb4bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 192.196.142.20 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gix-ietf-http-wg@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-4.043, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=2.19, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=0.865, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.703, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UAe4w-0005ec-Ln 350b35601b13b0fa15ea05397889f86f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/loom.20130227T111123-907@post.gmane.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16876
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

James M Snell <jasnell@...> writes:


> Fair enough 

There is a similar need for mput/mpost, the fact current web apps require 
a separate user sequence for each file a user wants to publish/attach to a 
message is one of the few remaining use-cases where they suck compared to 
local apps.

You can work around it by asking users to sip their set of files, but that 
does not make you popular.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email