IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Sun, 17 February 2013 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7846721F8B48 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:09:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emQGk20blaCo for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:09:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172221F8B46 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:09:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U7DKl-0000Fw-9F for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:07:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:07:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U7DKl-0000Fw-9F@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1U7DKb-0000Dz-MK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:07:37 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1U7DKZ-000299-MI for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:07:37 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i10so5401866oag.14 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Svpg7BqXjZUC9uV9KQ7HeslAxN3yTd8fY37+ITnepNI=; b=coW0ODM/YzAfodik8kVxwNwhLU5AEmEJ0R24hGWJdDXNGLx7ksNuwxmzxnSivMKPIW ZtdEPkuE9HDIh/Dsb/JOWHLIbgCZwYZ17/a5soelzX5AlclZ3pdQWdcf0DmxOgL3P3ph 3O0aDC1gJq0vqYROb6qj26adEEwu+/gPigaKxsCtTTpWByMR0eyTquoogPu8Jz2SFp86 b8yY9A+q8tQl7cYdJwGLaY6kWNgyl5UF40of/1EC0DkncKVwajigvuj+5jft6+4LBG4x uX54A+WHwDKNSc0TxnMwlJ+8D7lxXHmBYen0xKIMw9BDhF+638n3cEym3zjNecK7FosU tGBg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.51.98 with SMTP id j2mr5189079obo.77.1361142429615; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.23.193 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.23.193 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D9118B58-F53F-4F75-8292-2B990172E234@opengroupware.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiF6EM8_aQgUm=nPS5XqaG25iRGNke_rnHTM1vTGMXdfg@mail.gmail.com> <A6A82B6EF92590887D2A23D5@cyrus.local> <D9118B58-F53F-4F75-8292-2B990172E234@opengroupware.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:07:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
To: Helge Heß <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444815701874b04d5f3abb5"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.41; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f41.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.711, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1U7DKZ-000299-MI c747b4cb07a6af9ede4451a5179400bb
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Multi-GET, extreme compression?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbcX2OqttZuYeuYxhyOgE_ax0M67L1ywPy_VDpW1upM69Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16634
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

An mget that leverages server push in http/2 and individual cacheable
response streams would be very interesting and could address at least some
of the prioritization issues.
On Feb 17, 2013 12:17 PM, "Helge Heß" <helge.hess@opengroupware.org> wrote:

> On Feb 17, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:
> > We added a multiget REPORT to CalDAV (RFC4791) and CardDAV (RFC6352)
> which is used by clients when sync'ing a lot of resources (e.g., initial
> account setup). The one major criticism has been lack of cacheability of
> the individual resources included in the multiget.
>
> The other major criticisms being:
> a) content needs to be XML encoded
> b) only allows for GETs, not for other operations
>
> I'd also like to see a generic, HTTP-level BATCH request. Please lets not
> do 'just' an MGET.
>
> hh
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email