Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@gmail.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459DA1296BF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WcOp_eMotOPQ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F35B1296C3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bsZxm-00081e-Na for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:33:42 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:33:42 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bsZxm-00081e-Na@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <igrigorik@gmail.com>) id 1bsZxj-00080o-9X for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:33:39 +0000
Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <igrigorik@gmail.com>) id 1bsZxh-0008Ln-6k for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:33:38 +0000
Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b81so47538153lfe.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5Gn5h19lnhoctsePQROunWbUp4Rz/75Rv/0SIpmhQs4=; b=IcWsIl4y62DJanMzEANKIGfU7eGcNMOSzRE/9Ywm1D+adCzk+CrG3MV20bkvwFsE+V TXnq8BM1yk8JaKzilTUz0Khd2dgmHmUj0RHjrBDBDcGVLrndZHMQj8oplrW3HTuP0xNJ MAcrsxEPXBddnmeW3u1x12RCsyQ4JUy+tNSh83D4vz87LVn+oEq9axqBUL+0FajZtFhZ UNbVecY+vWIVYk7bUbZtaTlfU7LyLTlrhayCWGl9RoOfyEXs8lSEMkeMy5sHqus3hCaQ xA0781Q6b3BZbOv0QevH6mibknCOrSVuwyg6Li49W2665yhqZeAWoMQLgyjEGYYyDFA2 Wbqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5Gn5h19lnhoctsePQROunWbUp4Rz/75Rv/0SIpmhQs4=; b=QEthpEDkrCWebCYeC/lUehzVJvAEeFin4Sm6I8f/9wLTp7BsI989x/4dNf1ZozcpLR EwC7AmTEoxGFgbevYDzyWv4Ut6BbErNKr9MQE6ErXkv9+IG5KKus73iyAoMooTw5r5JG lyo9jBDeCkQerCJCIdAb0VD0Yblk7mkiMGUld0vHQNS/aQ7iX4RC/YTCRRoaPiy1+J8q clDAbapcuH0TCHznQopUMebQ6AxPgKibVwzXKzJmo7sN/+XydJkDzXp6aplUfRUBGQOM eeHxDJWE2HW64SK/G9CF2gVO5DYBr6FIvBC3bJ5pLnmoQwNu8G20EKyBPQfr29A9brR1 mTDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlMh4qZCdTJD1YY7WYksUn0BuhZg247PkjGI4m/z9elzBxmO6RBXgLrA5sfS8cUhUPcQxo+h49VMnugPw==
X-Received: by 10.46.9.75 with SMTP id 72mr8479173ljj.48.1475865190336; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 11:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.96.201 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <22539dc8-3adc-822a-609b-76e29afdd30a@gmx.de>
References: <22539dc8-3adc-822a-609b-76e29afdd30a@gmx.de>
From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:32:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKRe7JG0dHTQxp8cRViS7HtQUN6o+vOPoMchhxArVJ=tYZyd6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b1036681026053e4aa435
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.53; envelope-from=igrigorik@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf0-f53.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.643, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bsZxh-0008Ln-6k a7c1033f4f4edf0c8c500dab35da69f1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKRe7JG0dHTQxp8cRViS7HtQUN6o+vOPoMchhxArVJ=tYZyd6g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32522
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-reporting-1-20160407/#header
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/clear-site-data/#header
>> https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/#feature-policy-http-header-field
>>
>
> ...and my understanding is that their authors are willing to stick with
> JSON, willing to live with the known problems, and, in particular, not
> willing to switch to something else at this point. (Ilya?)


"Not willing" is too strong, I think. Perhaps a more accurate description
is: aware of the limitations previously discussed; cautiously moving
forward despite said limitations because there are pains that we need to
address [1]; willing to consider concrete alternative proposals if and when
they become available and have reasonable support from community -- i.e.
not a spaceship design that we can use in >5 years.

[1] https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/225#issue-170537461