IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Mon, 17 October 2016 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1E6129535 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlWPH9tMmVrP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501161294F5 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bwFcg-0003cg-N5 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:39:06 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:39:06 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bwFcg-0003cg-N5@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1bwFcb-0003bj-Gz for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:39:01 +0000
Received: from mail-by2nam03on0120.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.42.120] helo=NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1bwFcY-0007ya-2N for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:39:00 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RFHFZF0Lj/Uj3nm3tlfS03hmAyrPLUpGhF0k8+/9SzI=; b=ho++G0pIpq5Efvmu8p/HLBpVhRKrdtEJ912cqzY7VFXJSB6OJrGcXOPGjuVGFh9PQaNlfaifNyed9Wogoj2L5vGpjlgO7xvLR3caIB9aZghDIfnfidZB3iMoHqCy7ABxP0WoEMbdzlZrddzKuwPSEjpcpOdZBzv/+EUapu1jv5c=
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.15) by BN6PR03MB2705.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.173.144.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.659.11; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:38:29 +0000
Received: from BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) by BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.144.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0659.025; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:38:29 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
Thread-Index: AQHSJZPiWQZ+BgJwK0awJ9NGAJCGNKCpRVmAgAPiExKAAAIP3oAAA819gAAFFYA=
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:38:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB270876C3D24778ADEA23CAD487D00@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAEK7mvoXqyX3cADJytjU+C158EULgPLbzAb5kiUN=8WWxhi29Q@mail.gmail.com> <78301.1476524467@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvomoxSqTs5APVj=ZzG2wDz24PhJtsSibGQq2oGkv-zcLg@mail.gmail.com> <48285.1476737617@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvr_RWR6RbeXE47Ap4Vh21anu5mHTqaxbwtTmA1ZLQ1dmQ@mail.gmail.com> <48364.1476738075@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAEK7mvp5zDw7uo6ZP3KOhQiWWDuoEBAay5wPWYRgpoCNgnsidw@mail.gmail.com> <48410.1476738879@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <48410.1476738879@critter.freebsd.dk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:9::390]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a01802ab-4f58-4e0a-f619-08d3f6d5ef2e
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR03MB2705; 7:clB58scMGKm/mrBJS/ineU//Q8mQubJcGK30HrXhbnI3kWOGzkMZJwi8huL334gb1FFoOa4+IfDolDRnKa43UshV9QdrqBfvT41OjMxMRkrG1jGmXjUvvZi7eNHDSANGWhbbn4Kc/tlW3LLU/f4B/ZCVCfFDyArZJDvVnsfcZuaHF06pvsZOcZoCioOuZhMw0agPQvsdQqtkrLy9KWrtVflSlW73+DEBc3mCdOR9cE4NITPAdYSjIP8xU2qELaTQfLGakQ1cdbH03M7/29CCYIrMX8SedEWaLynUKm5q3IZzxPQs9DHNQrzdRlrNoG/rF78AratRj4xkmAkf+deqJl/BukfByjzrjZMAuhVdD6U8sY+li7bK3hp82z+GI6LZ
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR03MB2705;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR03MB27054CFBC613ED0A4E5B37DC87D00@BN6PR03MB2705.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(211936372134217);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BN6PR03MB2705; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2705;
x-forefront-prvs: 0098BA6C6C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(377454003)(189002)(13464003)(19580395003)(8936002)(9686002)(68736007)(5001770100001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(99286002)(230783001)(10400500002)(105586002)(189998001)(5002640100001)(8676002)(8990500004)(76576001)(81166006)(5660300001)(106356001)(106116001)(33656002)(2906002)(93886004)(10090500001)(4326007)(2950100002)(586003)(7736002)(77096005)(6116002)(101416001)(5005710100001)(102836003)(76176999)(54356999)(74316002)(50986999)(7846002)(11100500001)(92566002)(19580405001)(86612001)(2900100001)(7696004)(122556002)(10290500002)(97736004)(81156014)(87936001)(305945005)(86362001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR03MB2705; H:BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Oct 2016 21:38:29.0080 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR03MB2705
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.47.42.120; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.461, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bwFcY-0007ya-2N e3576eb67ef059656da2608487fec582
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN6PR03MB270876C3D24778ADEA23CAD487D00@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32620
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Sadly, yes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk] 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:15 PM
To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

--------
In message <CAEK7mvp5zDw7uo6ZP3KOhQiWWDuoEBAay5wPWYRgpoCNgnsidw@mail.gmail.com>
, Matt Menke writes:

>No, that would be treated as an HTTP/0.9 response.

Wow... that's a lot more tolerant than I would have expected.

Do you really still see HTTP/0.9 reponses in the wild ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email