IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?

Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com> Wed, 21 July 2010 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fenix@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B83A67FA for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CpR+-uis3yL7 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BFA3A65A5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o6L0GKNv004941 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:20 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1279671381; bh=301u8gQZ/yPNKbzG9vowrtGLwGk=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=qSgs8C1dRIH/404cYXJiwAC1hFWuCgRa13VFoKSma4ljH5RDj9PU6Y9fDm3xI8XvI IGFNq+QTY8uFxzW6wKS7g==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=RWbgfSP/W4GTNoijSfh3378dRIcRc9E0+VCBBzE3NWERQOgnfh7UTu2XuSFV0U1qW SQfQAhCp+lHbv+wyXU0nQ==
Received: from qwe5 (qwe5.prod.google.com [10.241.194.5]) by kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o6L0GCeS025744 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:19 -0700
Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so2566178qwe.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.44.203 with SMTP id b11mr6238773qaf.184.1279671378879; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.106.214 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiksB5QNIPzET7fNV0JNyB2yOZ9qSuMOEa-aLjX-@mail.gmail.com>
References: <h2w5c902b9e1004152345j992b815bz5f8d38f06a19181a@mail.gmail.com> <4BCAB2C1.2000404@webtide.com> <B9DC25B0-CD21-44E7-BD9B-06D0C9440933@apple.com> <4BCB7829.9010204@caucho.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004182349240.751@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC0A07.9030003@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004190753510.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC111C.90707@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004190837570.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC204D.30004@gmx.de> <z2gad99d8ce1004190822ne4dd36b6v54d63efcc448e840@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1007202204270.7242@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <AANLkTikkfdlUxQ0MGNvVQKa5gfovkGHWdCgyN9juKSQJ@mail.gmail.com> <4C462F9E.9030207@caucho.com> <AANLkTiksB5QNIPzET7fNV0JNyB2yOZ9qSuMOEa-aLjX-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:18 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimgeWEoLaZ8Fv6eLyi67-ZgC4caUF6C=ru8Ds1S@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00c09f88d1cef7a58b048bdab515"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:16:07 -0000

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 21 July 2010 09:22, Scott Ferguson <ferg@caucho.com> wrote:
>
>> Mike Belshe wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> For as adamantly as Ian states that it should be a requirement, I am just
>>> as adamant that it should not.
>>>
>>> Every protocol expert I've spoken with agrees that amateur protocol
>>> implementors should not be a requirement.
>>>
>>> Is there some way we can vote to either keep or nullify this requirement
>>> now and never come back to it again?  I'm tired of this obstacle holding
>>> everything up.
>>>
>> +1
>
> +1
>

yes, please. +1.
-=R

>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email