Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> Sat, 17 April 2010 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D906E3A6914 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.637, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzlZBj4kW1N0 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.221.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ED23A69DD for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so3409189qyk.15 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NBYLZ3F7DQARJk05aMiOdmSEiHlj7wJ4fHfvKpPkNT8=; b=DGjRIXPb79wd1z95NaVZgsDdpNjnLR2/axhDxtqImMMemUI/vir7LVTDx0vMfWFo3+ wol+5q77RTpmjg0DZUmPCHi7HbmjRiW2qRMwlzLlLp08GEkS6KsjC3n/xBLdAJxhI+Uk UBUdpMAns028alHIYu2ty3CYgU4jHssTDc9w4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=X+8YzzVZykBVaavcPPdS601AUxoee5ZJwxz/l7dvc17MO/MEy7/HQWqgS2Mfp6Zx20 X7nBSJuCMcbNDJEdrJshvonl6Y3GPIUEWSENlv4CLFYksuraYTRQwd44HqHt0hdrQatv V3z0lyaI0942u+N+5jgKTnxeeyBGGlj1CM0+s=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.17.84 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BC97653.9000507@webtide.com>
References: <h2w5c902b9e1004152345j992b815bz5f8d38f06a19181a@mail.gmail.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E3F313E5@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BC85E60.10501@webtide.com> <4BC88266.7020502@webtide.com> <r2o2a10ed241004160943g87fc24a1zb089a51229a1053a@mail.gmail.com> <4BC97653.9000507@webtide.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:04:51 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: f95fce1f3894078d
Received: by 10.229.227.83 with SMTP id iz19mr1645991qcb.44.1271509491988; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <n2g5c902b9e1004170604p6b8e874cr3ab8e7206559c783@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:05:06 -0000

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> wrote:
> But perhaps there is some room for a BWTP-like layer between
> base websockets and SPDY to provide the fragmentation and
> multi-channel stuff as something common to all websocket
> users of those facilities.  So maybe I should drop the
> HTTP stuff and focus on fragmentation and multiplexing?

+1.  The more experimentation we have around fragmentation and
multiplexing, the more insights we'll gain there.  -- justin