IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?

Scott Ferguson <ferg@caucho.com> Tue, 20 July 2010 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ferg@caucho.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD753A6972 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JokZuEgTznV6 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp114.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.68.79]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DB3F3A6925 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 63335 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2010 23:22:11 -0000
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (ferg@66.92.8.203 with plain) by smtp114.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 16:22:11 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: L1_TBRiswBB5.MuzAo8Yf89wczFo0A2C
X-YMail-OSG: lssh2sgVM1k.OsicPkVyTZCmh64wQSqmPebhvuRxvofTLR0 3heGK0WlSO3MtJZLJulOS8s2cQWXuYgAZUvHu9lxHM9XhKolHThLFue7GNbc 6Ho64cn8iJNrUshAiPMeqiP5MjUmW.tRZxBJ9WA4qhIiU5jMNNDPb4zMsRJw NuNEua0FY07btSYJIoU0Te.U.ownvvA1x_eQKLs4MX2MC11Eq2lS0RBaQdEt 45EPTfFmffae7MMXAHWarrc9EgwYy.A_PuLeMN7O_AsO27NhKSMjAWLNJBGp nPht5LEdq.mAKYezGOW9C
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4C462F9E.9030207@caucho.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:22:06 -0700
From: Scott Ferguson <ferg@caucho.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
References: <h2w5c902b9e1004152345j992b815bz5f8d38f06a19181a@mail.gmail.com> <4BCAB2C1.2000404@webtide.com> <B9DC25B0-CD21-44E7-BD9B-06D0C9440933@apple.com> <4BCB7829.9010204@caucho.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004182349240.751@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC0A07.9030003@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004190753510.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC111C.90707@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004190837570.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BCC204D.30004@gmx.de> <z2gad99d8ce1004190822ne4dd36b6v54d63efcc448e840@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1007202204270.7242@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <AANLkTikkfdlUxQ0MGNvVQKa5gfovkGHWdCgyN9juKSQJ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikkfdlUxQ0MGNvVQKa5gfovkGHWdCgyN9juKSQJ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Extensibility mechanisms?
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:22:06 -0000

Mike Belshe wrote:
>
> For as adamantly as Ian states that it should be a requirement, I am 
> just as adamant that it should not.
>
> Every protocol expert I've spoken with agrees that amateur protocol 
> implementors should not be a requirement.
>
> Is there some way we can vote to either keep or nullify this 
> requirement now and never come back to it again?  I'm tired of this 
> obstacle holding everything up.
+1

-- Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email