IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data

John Tamplin <jat@google.com> Thu, 10 March 2011 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jat@google.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEC23A6ADE for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:58:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.937
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.937 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qkdgL5sjTIPe for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477563A6A79 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p2AM05Iw010078 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:00:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1299794405; bh=oD4xUTg0mkjdvXSCofWhKxcGHiw=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=h3K0EaXHhmn/UPdd9VkHlXlz7w7NGE2cXdI77K74k2inAoTtQSvfQgtr54sq42ymm nByxAYEswXK0ZDVtOYb2Q==
Received: from gwb11 (gwb11.prod.google.com [10.200.2.11]) by kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p2AM03ZN020131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:00:04 -0800
Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so677845gwb.6 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:00:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OpX9pnFYZYHMlXWH++ya821X6le7RXlbjGRiD7VEndE=; b=CRk6W3lPjc8l0WkN009VGm5Ueyy4syKsvlByIZl2rk+aXGxwinpacetN5aspQ5vdgR 6Seh13wPpnJwv1fq1KYQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=nLWjCQV2aDv066yrN9HETXjyl9S0wC+tByTIwuXS4t4guOMjsusg1Q7pXiIM+In4Oh NK8rXqNwOLvn22ZabtHQ==
Received: by 10.150.99.19 with SMTP id w19mr1656577ybb.295.1299794403144; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:00:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.200.16 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:59:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=nEZSaSOU3Ez41fn6UzOYXrFC0G5WwWs26cos4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4D77B885.5050109@callenish.com> <OF36FEDDC6.06951577-ON8825784E.0062343E-8825784E.0066AC27@playstation.sony.com> <AANLkTinau4g1pB_ccJ31u7WRi5npYtHvXE5YRn5uTbeV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikB4YeaYiF_NVGn61c1YxpNWbmEWQZu1WcN+=Jf@mail.gmail.com> <1299704939.2606.238.camel@ds9.ducksong.com> <20110309214212.GA29190@1wt.eu> <AANLkTi=i=8aWg=6+T7=Kn5dWeKkW6MYVCH_CuNkt_ZMM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimip9o0RoZaBfONCmg5nuJVWXjOKDKgAt8zrNVV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikbFBeM6+hiURSBqxFyjc2Wc-yh8UJnZiO+U0JX@mail.gmail.com> <4D7915FF.50300@callenish.com> <AANLkTik557Y=tvpA-CypTgrGpxJTtfscmFuGKi0YEt0d@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikbObWcOzFZGrS=yWZqzVdpm6z4j2B+WfEbqQWX@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=Dc355npia4g3zijYOrt0BfiwbX9bUGzXa=Cq1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikaECyZ-jQ+pX1eOezBrGTajrBk6TwNQ7ZCE1GY@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin-6t=yyPKqBJ38WsNBy5+b4d5MmKpPmdNfh0UQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimvZ_dX6-6Gt5BW3-cUHmZm1pq=nYm8HTsykbW3@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinPp5bCrwhy1oWvZZvt0VCzN=rDjKgz7inq7nrO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin7=_ywd8M-A4yZ=fQ=nTyHSLzeV34Jgyi+JCps@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim8KH2Gpoie=VmRgtTZGWK7FJkUsB_G96ByhbEv@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=r54HY7JHOgmOSKwjnzM=cpbtjRdVUa-adRgr6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=X7wnaR0_MJQx4tfHmWivKM1NcNqNLBzKU5j3x@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTingriyazkuo8mkhCR=fEL=g152ioPfRAEjiiWgR@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=nEZSaSOU3Ez41fn6UzOYXrFC0G5WwWs26cos4@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Tamplin <jat@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:59:43 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinT2Du8wHncqN1EFWq4ONeKOJwfGNh1wfdV59xs@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd299a8ae365e049e27f79b"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:58:48 -0000

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> > I don't think the fact that the way it is in the draft requires a higher
> bar
> > to change it than if it weren't in the draft.
>
> Unfortunately the bar is higher.  If we don't reach consensus to
> remove masking from the framing now, then framing would have been
> significantly changed without any consensus.     I think the chairs
> need to consider that when making the call on this issue - as it is
> not unanimous.
>

If we don't reach consensus on how masking should be done, then we don't
have a final spec yet.  It doesn't matter which alternative that lacks
sufficient support is mentioned in the draft, it still isn't done at that
point.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email