Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Wed, 09 March 2011 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DBA3A6968 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:48:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.153, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wtq2uX0hLNv2 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6193A695F for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so465100vxg.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:49:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.69.46 with SMTP id b14mr3793883vdu.103.1299671361417; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gregw@intalio.com
Received: by 10.52.169.39 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 03:49:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimXDOcf_X5DT57UjVc0iC4fh_qQssdHvUOc23D8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim7js6hPBMoEgmzr3gH-NuRYkEZ-pAePkgo=Q=L@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimcTUYRMBA7XfYpbUNX26eup+oq2C3cL-q8+gf-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=uV_axB7bU2juczGp_gW1_ZPRXpVC1+01jrBO2@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimXDOcf_X5DT57UjVc0iC4fh_qQssdHvUOc23D8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:49:21 +1100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GUsr9_n8l5kzREb8hkW6y1P38Lw
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6O2+5psZSZM52LawhHcB-BT5spF6jhKdYQqHV@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
To: ifette@google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] Masking only Payload/Extension Data
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:48:06 -0000

2011/3/9 Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com>:
> Ok, I really don't care so I will just go along here. That said, it doesn't
> seem like the above will let you figure out if you're looking at a masked
> frame or an unmasked frame. Does that matter?

Not to me.   Even though masking IS NOT an extension, I think of it
just like one.  You need to have seen the handshake or some other
context of the frame to know if the extension applies or not.

cheers