Re: [hybi] [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes

Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> Tue, 11 August 2009 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6563A6EA0; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.684
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.684 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.339, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9w6hqSRN7LOt; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shark.2a.pl (shark.2a.pl [195.117.102.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B5F3A6EC9; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AB42A6A83; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at 2a.pl
Received: from shark.2a.pl ([195.117.102.3]) by av.2a.pl (av.2a.pl [195.117.102.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PlFT1aowL0+G; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:56:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from POCZTOWIEC (unknown [10.8.1.26]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DA4E62A6AA0; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:56:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
To: 'David Booth' <david@dbooth.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908070531430.28566@hixie.dreamhostps.com> <1249651007.25446.8934.camel@dbooth-laptop> <0B450D619CC0486E8BD51C31FBA214AD@POCZTOWIEC> <1250025544.3990.1565.camel@dbooth-laptop>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:56:08 +0200
Message-ID: <2B6D2E5A840A49A0A40C97D25BCCF721@POCZTOWIEC>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcoaylG0VmKLxYDVTn2NWdc9zaGjcAAA2Kww
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
In-Reply-To: <1250025544.3990.1565.camel@dbooth-laptop>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:15:07 -0700
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:59:54 -0000

A "custom protocol" is, using David's terms, an owner-dependent protocol,
whereas a "standard protocol" is an owner-independent protocol.  "Owner" is
the owner of the aliasing domain.  A protocol is owner-dependent if the
server is guaranteed to belong to the owner (e.g. a bank or an ISP).
HTH,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: David Booth [mailto:david@dbooth.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:19 PM
To: Kristof Zelechovski
Cc: 'Ian Hickson'; uri-review@ietf.org; hybi@ietf.org; uri@w3.org
Subject: RE: [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes

On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 18:35 +0200, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> 
>  2.  Additionally, the proposed solution of using the URI prefix
> "http://wss.example/" is suited for custom protocols, according to the
> description at [1].  A protocol promulgated by the WWW Corporation can
> hardly be viewed as custom.

I don't know exactly what you mean by "custom protocol", but WSS is
*exactly* the kind of protocol that [1] was talking about.  The
introduction uses "XyzConsortium" as an example, but you can think "WWW
Corporation" instead.

David