Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9055E12EBE1 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJq-fmLMKB6L for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (smtpjc.telefonica.com [81.47.204.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF50612EAB9 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpjc.telefonica.com (tgtimjc803.telefonica.com [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F082F095E; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:35:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESTGVMSP105.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ESTGVMSP105", Issuer "ESTGVMSP105" (not verified)) by smtpjc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17F12F095D; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:35:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.92.6.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:35:28 +0200
Received: from DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.142) by DB4PR06MB0621.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.453.26; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:34:26 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.142]) by DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0453.031; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:34:26 +0000
From: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
Thread-Index: AdGVjiepefzP6ZiFQDeBQHMdS7A43wAAUAiQAU/RpoA=
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:34:26 +0000
Message-ID: <F5472D66-1341-48BD-9BFB-1E0C6DF678F8@telefonica.com>
References: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: avaya.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;avaya.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=telefonica.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [62.205.119.67]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 12493448-040d-4c9d-b656-08d368e5d1a8
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB0621; 5:8j31Ajzt3B8mfkcw6qWzZDJWXtjFkzIgsoJX3GRlagLA59absec+ohD0usfiuStwKXJ4oMxD6u1H61ll2pS5asIO2gvQf29kKCMIaUDIbqD3ospA4rQN//l7FHut5g/jjk9iMFaJXCFydTR0JfGyag==; 24:6zkfJQiQpAFj81NQAaSkoDpLMMdXVU5yJC4VZeBfXmIo8WIVAhUv//5c9/31YvEjjDvZ1PWlwYLgcYP0R7iEC/i2/tbSnGG5J9McG3V8Nfk=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0621;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR06MB062183EC1FBC383E8D641E59DF6D0@DB4PR06MB0621.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(9101521026)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:DB4PR06MB0621; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0621;
x-forefront-prvs: 0918748D70
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(252514010)(13464003)(24454002)(377454003)(83716003)(2906002)(15975445007)(92566002)(2900100001)(4326007)(122556002)(189998001)(76176999)(2950100001)(3280700002)(66066001)(50986999)(54356999)(3660700001)(110136002)(86362001)(586003)(33656002)(16236675004)(81166005)(5004730100002)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(77096005)(19580395003)(10400500002)(19580405001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(36756003)(6116002)(102836003)(82746002)(19617315012)(1220700001)(1096002)(3846002)(7059030)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0621; H:DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5472D66134148BD9BFB1E0C6DF678F8telefonicacom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Apr 2016 06:34:26.2572 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB0621
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/0dsWEZI7oTizx4mddtgGhTJdenI>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:35:36 -0000

Hi,

My intention is to include in the framework a (generalized, not limited to virtualized environments) discussion on the threats and the mitigation provided by attestation in the framework, together with recommendations on attestation procedures. Going into a complete discussion of attestation in the framework draft seems going too far to me, and I’d prefer to have it in a separate document. That document (the current draft-pastor-…) could be merged in the future with others on specific I2NSF procedures.

Does it sound like an acceptable plan?

Be goode,

On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:26 , Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com<mailto:dromasca@avaya.com>> wrote:

I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for the work in I2NSF and support their adoption.

As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration.

Regards,

Dan




-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

Hi WG,

In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology
drafts.

Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these
documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed
that no-one at the meeting objected.

So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of:


_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:I2nsf@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
----------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição