IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Tue, 19 April 2016 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8482012E1AC for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8A4Piz3HCa2x for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9498712E172 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k142so14662073oib.1 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=wxumXPgUJK76jMpq7Tm+QuOhaeqJ4QQeJZcctmdqYDg=; b=cgKU0haShDOa86znZcrDsNKmMfczcIjvws4VCIZn87D8DGz0dqrTa7zubaw8N+pnHq JjJH1htQMzkPizjeDZPc+lWr6IVmuBrIvvW+yALSvbDN0cK3OmrPxnSDGxMew2NahhwA zJFwk5Hi8Q2uz1o3Qxkb8cIBseGcy+z8V0WcJGphWFt9UC2vtpy0hO8ljzgAoSeCXIWa z80r3eUak4sFJATtt/NjAuBeEKvALBeQ9guI0Gn7T6x2vVKOcO1hSctuxXfyY05TwMKe FEvN2bUnJ/pCy8rfvGwaAqagRF4/gXYgwqWzrCPQWMXkMymjgHKUhx42xU+sUPIsYXWS PChg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=wxumXPgUJK76jMpq7Tm+QuOhaeqJ4QQeJZcctmdqYDg=; b=fa5Vh0idi43SF3ytzL7TcjKIczkrTmiEkafnlo47BXf/d2+EnDeHJ8HGryu3sT0eed 7M9CsKSP825F3l7wKi5VefThT9XM1StGzJDVIbS2JPgcSmGu2Wmr+pfUyF5Bf4Ki8KRj 9gyjRhj0v22p8bytX2fQ+LQWbdrmioAVzm/dO6K4YkI68GB+0Tf4GQ23q7dz+KtCsy2U wz3ntXbe40jWzhI6ZUrNLbV4ieKajWGGYceyuXODm5ZKe73sxXjNhzhhKn8sSmrSnbqd aGiYK1mNXotP3VBewVcyePu5GzMlshmY0Aic4P2GVbExO/hX9DS4GeEkUxqvJyXd99HN tevg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW0KATJJ2RDnlyaBS4JS2R+xcailOtpNnKKCG9I5wNejtRMt+CKRgeFDf27lBl9Xu3h9M/0A27vq4fMkg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.51.130 with SMTP id z124mr1634124oiz.27.1461084028949; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.157.29.170 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrGMVMTq03+3MGhxgTmAeWUGG4Wsjfk=rps27sgR-BET+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cd14a885d7c0530d92261"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/Ap50M2fEtMIL-cirT1tWBH_W4d0>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:40:32 -0000

Sorry, my reply got stuck.

As a co-author of both drafts, I feel that they each represent a good
starting point for our work, and feel that both should be adopted.
I will close the loop with Henk (SACM terminology) soon.

Also, as a co-author, I know of no IPR related to either draft.

regards,
John

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>
wrote:

> I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for
> the work in I2NSF and support their adoption.
>
> As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation
> for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in
> the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> > To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> > Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
> >
> > Hi WG,
> >
> > In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology
> > drafts.
> >
> > Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these
> > documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed
> > that no-one at the meeting objected.
> >
> > So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of:
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>



-- 
regards,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email