Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> Sat, 23 April 2016 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B5D12D648 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.616
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNXR3UoLCe_q for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtptc.telefonica.com (smtptc.telefonica.com [195.76.34.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B67312D5A4 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtptc.telefonica.com (tgtim3c03.telefonica.com [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898183A02D0; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 22:30:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESTGVMSP112.EUROPE.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.92.4.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ESTGVMSP112", Issuer "ESTGVMSP112" (not verified)) by smtptc.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8503A0253; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 22:30:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.92.5.139) by tls.telefonica.com (10.93.6.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 22:30:58 +0200
Received: from DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.142) by DB4PR06MB0623.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.161.13.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.485.3; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:30:57 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.142]) by DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.13.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0485.003; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:30:57 +0000
From: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
To: John Strassner <John.sc.Strassner@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
Thread-Index: AdGVjiepefzP6ZiFQDeBQHMdS7A43wAAUAiQAU/RpoAAT6oHgAAKVA+AAApS34AAGAbEMAA3vyEA
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:30:57 +0000
Message-ID: <AA0024D1-18C4-4E14-A44D-364649D467D7@telefonica.com>
References: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F5472D66-1341-48BD-9BFB-1E0C6DF678F8@telefonica.com> <CAJwYUrEdocFCD7vpvz5mhs3FK=2NK3YFBO8i_nnpWc=AFN2jEQ@mail.gmail.com> <018001d19c36$a77b55a0$f67200e0$@ndzh.com> <CD1CBF55-F04F-477B-B7E9-A10F1591140D@telefonica.com> <B818037A70EDCC4A86113DA25EC0209820225B6F@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B818037A70EDCC4A86113DA25EC0209820225B6F@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=telefonica.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [83.58.199.157]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 320f35fd-d4ea-4d31-1cb6-08d36bb62d42
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB0623; 5:bjR87gKwDmhIxzCaHylUG3wJFrFvS9VE3K9Y6yaGXwFTJPdWGzl8a4qbe8P7fNlfJGKm8tnBqBd+TYWBjShmr+7oSHWUHAbOTDsiDvp5YfEpjIYKfwiC+07OBCAgWs1aSSTq1uAnqDjov7MKi1YzKA==; 24:Y4dIIokptfDz8cJhSCwJTXvWZ4PsMBjcMje6akdaRm90IFQYWnZlubm5knkTSwlU6nDpcQxxrq+mtmBJ4u+e2Ee0PHAFSVdkxavWRd2B/4A=; 7:2T3lAS1AQMipxbpYnkez9Cc2m58qzQICYNy65yFAG4z4ZmjxNosWyORSCgIWO5qBGbRejVqVm64R1Z9eBlJuVKaJe746xluIt3fIOBi3JEddHi0mxXQ52xQJn2xjKLh58uPScJjjDqI6w7bA5mLfZF5CqVm+l5BJDfkTJnr4CEYvTqkE+RKIzIlOJivZYHBb
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0623;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR06MB06237C76DADC09B5E1AD9B0EDF600@DB4PR06MB0623.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(9101521026)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:DB4PR06MB0623; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0623;
x-forefront-prvs: 0921D55E4F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(24454002)(13464003)(40134004)(377454003)(51444003)(77096005)(15975445007)(19617315012)(5008740100001)(93886004)(1220700001)(102836003)(3846002)(66066001)(1096002)(6116002)(586003)(19580405001)(82746002)(19580395003)(86362001)(122556002)(5004730100002)(4326007)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(92566002)(2906002)(3280700002)(110136002)(189998001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(3660700001)(16236675004)(81166005)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(87936001)(83716003)(10400500002)(33656002)(36756003)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0623; H:DB4PR06MB0624.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AA0024D118C44E14A44D364649D467D7telefonicacom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Apr 2016 20:30:57.4867 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9744600e-3e04-492e-baa1-25ec245c6f10
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB0623
X-OriginatorOrg: telefonica.com
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/gi09qE1aiZlTRpXaVfNekXFtNQ4>
Cc: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 20:31:07 -0000
Good! I’ll put you in the loop in the moment I start moving things around… Be goode, On 22 Apr 2016, at 19:55 , John Strassner <John.sc.Strassner@huawei.com<mailto:John.sc.Strassner@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Diego, I'd like to do both. best regards, John From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:27 PM To: Susan Hares; John Strassner Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Adrian Farrel Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Good! I’ll work on the integration of the threats and mitigation text into the framework doc in a few days. And then we will start reshaping the attestation draft accordingly, and bringing in the comments made in BBA. John, I understand you were willing to get mostly involved in the framework doc or do you feel like playing with attestation draft as well? Be goode, On 22 Apr 2016, at 03:31 , Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote: Diego and John: This seems like a very good approach to provide the threats and mitigation in the framework, and leave the specifics for another document. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Strassner Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:35 PM To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA; John Strassner Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Hi Diego, I think that this is a very good approach. I'd be happy to help. regards, John On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:34 PM, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com<mailto:diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>> wrote: Hi, My intention is to include in the framework a (generalized, not limited to virtualized environments) discussion on the threats and the mitigation provided by attestation in the framework, together with recommendations on attestation procedures. Going into a complete discussion of attestation in the framework draft seems going too far to me, and I’d prefer to have it in a separate document. That document (the current draft-pastor-…) could be merged in the future with others on specific I2NSF procedures. Does it sound like an acceptable plan? Be goode, On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:26 , Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com<mailto:dromasca@avaya.com>> wrote: I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for the work in I2NSF and support their adoption. As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration. Regards, Dan -----Original Message----- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org> Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Hi WG, In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology drafts. Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed that no-one at the meeting objected. So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of: _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:I2nsf@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com<mailto:diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> Tel: +34 913 129 041<tel:%2B34%20913%20129%20041> Mobile: +34 682 051 091<tel:%2B34%20682%20051%20091> ---------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:I2nsf@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- regards, John _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:I2nsf@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com<mailto:diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ---------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ---------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
- [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Adrian Farrel
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts John Strassner
- [I2nsf] 答复: Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Xialiang (Frank)
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- [I2nsf] 答复: Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Youjianjie
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts christian.jacquenet
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Luyuan Fang
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts John Strassner
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Sumandra Majee
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Susan Hares
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts John Strassner
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
- Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong