Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 22 April 2016 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF2012EC5C for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GyqVFzO4AVka for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94A912EC5A for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.77;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'John Strassner' <strazpdj@gmail.com>, 'DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA' <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com>
References: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <F5472D66-1341-48BD-9BFB-1E0C6DF678F8@telefonica.com> <CAJwYUrEdocFCD7vpvz5mhs3FK=2NK3YFBO8i_nnpWc=AFN2jEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJwYUrEdocFCD7vpvz5mhs3FK=2NK3YFBO8i_nnpWc=AFN2jEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:31:11 -0400
Message-ID: <018001d19c36$a77b55a0$f67200e0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0181_01D19C15.206E4980"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIru0JPnlaiJwsouMm/4SYMQbN0yAEaQYzhAYK/IcsCDA0llp67rhWw
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/JOHIFf0tQXVRC-NhA_f8Uv1bah4>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org, "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:31:06 -0000

Diego and John: 

 

This seems like a very good approach to provide the threats and mitigation in the framework, and leave the specifics for another document. 

 

Sue 

 

From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Strassner
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:35 PM
To: DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA; John Strassner
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

 

Hi Diego,

 

I think that this is a very good approach. I'd be happy to help.

 

regards,

John

 

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:34 PM, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> wrote:

Hi, 

 

My intention is to include in the framework a (generalized, not limited to virtualized environments) discussion on the threats and the mitigation provided by attestation in the framework, together with recommendations on attestation procedures. Going into a complete discussion of attestation in the framework draft seems going too far to me, and I’d prefer to have it in a separate document. That document (the current draft-pastor-…) could be merged in the future with others on specific I2NSF procedures.

 

Does it sound like an acceptable plan?

 

Be goode,

 

On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:26 , Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

 

I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for the work in I2NSF and support their adoption. 

As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration. 

Regards,

Dan







-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

Hi WG,

In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology
drafts.

Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these
documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed
that no-one at the meeting objected.

So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of:


_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

 

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com
Tel:    +34 913 129 041 <tel:%2B34%20913%20129%20041> 
Mobile: +34 682 051 091 <tel:%2B34%20682%20051%20091> 
----------------------------------

 

 

  _____  


Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição


_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf




-- 

regards,

John