IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C988612DC43 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xCaL8LZZJYL for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978BA12DBFD for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2ABAgDeVQ5X/yYyC4deGgEBAYJvK4FQBrpGAQ2BdIR+gRACgT84FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RBAQEBAQMSKEsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBqIBgGmDZ0TAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBAQEYhiKESoQ/gyuCKwWXREQBj3OHagyFM48nHgEBQoIEGYFKbIh8AX0BAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2ABAgDeVQ5X/yYyC4deGgEBAYJvK4FQBrpGAQ2BdIR+gRACgT84FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RBAQEBAQMSKEsEAgEIDQQEAQELFAkHMhQJCAEBBAESCBqIBgGmDZ0TAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBAQEYhiKESoQ/gyuCKwWXREQBj3OHagyFM48nHgEBQoIEGYFKbIh8AX0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,479,1454994000"; d="scan'208";a="170196950"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2016 10:26:41 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.14]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 13 Apr 2016 10:26:18 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC04.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.14]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:26:15 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
Thread-Index: AdGVjiepefzP6ZiFQDeBQHMdS7A43wAAUAiQ
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:26:15 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751C6643@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <070601d1958e$2c736630$855a3290$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/wep9CBPEvAGdZtWG1GrmXvb40Zo>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:26:44 -0000

I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for the work in I2NSF and support their adoption. 

As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration. 

Regards,

Dan




> -----Original Message-----
> From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology
> drafts.
> 
> Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these
> documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed
> that no-one at the meeting objected.
> 
> So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of:
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email