Re: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts

Hi Diego,

I think that this is a very good approach. I'd be happy to help.

regards,
John

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:34 PM, DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <
diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My intention is to include in the framework a (generalized, not limited to
> virtualized environments) discussion on the threats and the mitigation
> provided by attestation in the framework, together with recommendations on
> attestation procedures. Going into a complete discussion of attestation in
> the framework draft seems going too far to me, and I’d prefer to have it in
> a separate document. That document (the current draft-pastor-…) could be
> merged in the future with others on specific I2NSF procedures.
>
> Does it sound like an acceptable plan?
>
> Be goode,
>
> On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:26 , Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have read both drafts and I believe that they are a good foundation for
> the work in I2NSF and support their adoption.
>
> As I said in the meeting at IETF 95 I believe that the Remote Attestation
> for vNSFs (draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation) should also be included in
> the framework, and I would like to see it taken into consideration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org <i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org>] On
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: [I2nsf] Poll for adoption of two new WG drafts
>
> Hi WG,
>
> In Buenos Aires we had a discussion of the Framework and Terminology
> drafts.
>
> Although the authors have various changes planned, the chairs think these
> documents are ready for adoption into the WG. A poll of the room showed
> that no-one at the meeting objected.
>
> So this starts a formal, two-week poll for adoption of:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>
>
> --
> "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"
>
> Dr Diego R. Lopez
> Telefonica I+D
> http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/
>
> e-mail: diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com
> Tel:    +34 913 129 041
> Mobile: +34 682 051 091
> ----------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de
> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos
> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su
> destrucción.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the
> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete
> it.
>
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
> pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo
> da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário
> indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou
> cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente.
> Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique
> imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>
>

-- 
regards,
John