[Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 03 August 2015 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5FF1B30C4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuZFr_YFA5pk for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1481B30EB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFC12CEE6 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:13:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLMx9GO9P_u5 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:13:33 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E434C2CCD1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:13:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5FEBFE74-D0E6-4260-818E-0550CF7EA26C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:13:31 +0300
Message-Id: <7DAC25D2-2321-4918-806C-A598C97F562C@piuha.net>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/T--JQaoqwatS-4h8e8CoQNvZJ54>
Subject: [Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:13:45 -0000

Speaking as the AD for the group, and seeking some feedback.

The ICG has completed its assembly and assessment of the combined proposal. Please participate in the webinars, file your own public comments, etc. as appropriate.

The IAB's IANA program is planning to draft some comments about how well the combined proposal works for the IETF, for submission on behalf of the program or perhaps the full IAB. The text from draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response is in the combined proposal in its entirety, we have already established IETF support for going forward with our proposal, and (I think) the ICG has identified the relevant interaction points between the protocol parameters proposal and the rest. As a result, current thinking within the IANA program is to say that we support the IANA transition proposal put forth by the ICG insofar as it relates to the IETF. If people think we should not say that or should say something different, that would be good to know.

Also, separately, are there additional questions around the interaction points between our proposal and the rest that would be worthwhile to raise at this point?

If people have more specific comments on, say, details of the CRISP or CWG proposals, it might be best for you to submit those yourselves in the public comment process.

The public comment period ends on September 8. The IANA program will start crafting some text, but it would be good to get initial feedback now to help shape it.

Jari