IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Sun, 09 August 2015 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFA81B2C8D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e7WwKSHJC6_1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02271B2C8B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 16:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabyb7 with SMTP id yb7so92960896pab.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=4Zd6XOFKitxUKpor7R8Kw2CRQuf3O8Ik6x7oBX4p3K8=; b=hZPv4/7PIGoDwA3IHU46IYkIMctiUDKYjoMlaBsn8WCz6o1JbHFkO+KlHWf/fNbCId k5eUPjivNnhSfNaz87IFaBaPzN96WsnlCogiKFvQf/HBi+VWJXZ5QianAfT4qOqE0O0Y 0oR/anWsuPFCSj3DiZNp29WwggZ30+q7ZriP5FmphQBERPK5eA7i/gpaI1hzgW4Gy8Vf C/QXDx9rxezMC2DPh5exAdp5UAqdYwjFKd1cH314GAJgWyN4SrSXxW6xeokZb1O4HSFJ SCKQw1RqNUK76C8WlOzzAFysgMgeFjRekS7gFoxoE2qpkmENXlg/BBZk33ZpnLooV2bZ saoQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.102.2 with SMTP id fk2mr27820167pab.9.1439163619474; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.89.175] (mobile-166-176-186-106.mycingular.net. [166.176.186.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm17656652pdn.10.2015.08.09.16.40.17 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
References: <7DAC25D2-2321-4918-806C-A598C97F562C@piuha.net> <55C74A93.2090300@cisco.com> <F9E7BCC9-9D38-4B40-9A30-DF22E7210AFC@gmail.com> <B3BFE2FA-2FBF-4E76-98ED-9745E5B6B25F@arin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <B3BFE2FA-2FBF-4E76-98ED-9745E5B6B25F@arin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5499CA1A-F15D-42A1-88F4-505E19FD4C48@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 16:40:13 -0700
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/trdEz0IgAqjpaH4OVx6Cl09Q6C0>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 23:40:21 -0000

On Aug 9, 2015, at 9:00 AM, John Curran <jcurran@arin.net> wrote:
> 
> It is unclear if this approach would work... I mention it solely 
> because it may provide a potential avenue of exploration which would allow further progress on establishing necessary foundational pieces for transition.

[BA] It is concerning that the steps toward agreement are no more clear now (and potentially less so, with the introduction of PTI) than they were several months ago when we at least believed we understood the parties to the necessary agreements.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email