Re: [Ianaplan] on considering consensus

["Richard Hill" <[e-mail]>]

Please see inline below.

Thanks and best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Eliot
> Lear
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 07:25
> To: Leslie Daigle (TCE); Marc Blanchet
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Ianaplan] on considering consensus
> 
> Hi Leslie & Marc,
> 
> I realize I'm being a bit of a pain on this one and I am sorry this
> weights on you two, but...  I have two concerns about the text that you
> put out as a proposed edit:
> 
> 1.  The first is that apart from saying that some haven't read the
> proposal, Richard hasn't actually raised a substantial objection that
> we can discuss. 

I'm sure that several people on this list have consulted the ICG comments web site and have seen my substantive objections to the ICG proposal.

I don't see how it would be productive to use this list to open discussion on the full proposal, because much of that discussion would concern issues relating to domain names and ICANN accountability that do not seem to me to be of much concern to the IETF as a standards-making body. 

> Richard also raised a process issue that I believe
> Andrew dispensed with.

But I disagree that Andrew has dispensed with it.

> 
> 2.  While we do confirm consensus in mailing lists, I would just ask
> that you not forget the 15 or so people who took the time to
> participate in the interim meeting and worked to come to unanimous
> agreement on the previous text.
> 
> As such, I would ask that we revert to the text agreed to by the
> interim.

I maintain my objection to that text.

> 
> Eliot
>