IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version

Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> Tue, 08 August 2017 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661681323BF for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teFKaXIuF0hf for <ideas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC7DB132375 for <ideas@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DSZ26233; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:42:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:42:43 +0100
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.240]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:42:30 -0700
From: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
To: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault <padma@huawei.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
CC: "ideas@ietf.org" <ideas@ietf.org>, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version
Thread-Index: AQHTDzzgUS7uPdtb6kawD7XMB3wLtKJ5q4cAgAAilQD//5w1UIAAe0SAgADVykA=
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:42:29 +0000
Message-ID: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0E0ED3A0@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAG-CQxpxDXxLXdu0a2GdBRfTFLM_C+jqCz58HoNim52C7Yzr8g@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35qzym9quRRdv-TFDJW-hRXe+iGi8Db5T16JD8mExbr4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-CQxoWTrhhTD7gOyceDn+WEKqDfa11rqv2810Hdg028z4Ygg@mail.gmail.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0E0ED16F@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com> <EC7A99B9A59C1B4695037EEB5036666B026FED52@SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC7A99B9A59C1B4695037EEB5036666B026FED52@SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.213.48.108]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0E0ED3A0SJCEML703CHMchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0201.5989F815.003E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.240, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 018e6e1cce410ee72e0571540e9b9256
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/BkqSFsccgwSJQLPhPD0b4IdeiTQ>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:42:57 -0000

OK.

If we want to have a more specific list of supported mappings, it may be useful to mention some of those other mappings as well – by means of example, mappings between identifiers.

Thanks
--- Alex

From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>; Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: ideas@ietf.org; Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version

Alex

My understanding is that Tom did NOT ask for removing of identity concept.
He asked to make the section on common infrastructure clearer with this sentence.

I agree with you that the mappings should not be restricted to 1->n

Thanks
Padma

From: Ideas [mailto:ideas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Clemm
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 2:34 PM
To: Padma Pillay-Esnault; Tom Herbert
Cc: ideas@ietf.org<mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version

I am not sure we should restrict ourselves to mapping between identifiers and locators.

I would at a minimum want to include mappings between identifiers, and between identifiers and (for lack of a better term) groupings of identifiers.

If we take out the identity concept, we should also rename the WG.

--- Alex

From: Ideas [mailto:ideas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Padma Pillay-Esnault
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 1:28 PM
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com<mailto:tom@herbertland.com>>
Cc: ideas@ietf.org<mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Your Input requested: Charter Proposal New Version

Hi Tom


>
> To this end, the working group shall:
>
> - define a framework for the development of an identifier/locator mapping
> system that provides a common solution for all identifier/locator mapping
> protocols and network virtualization.
>
Padma,

I think this statement could be stronger and express that the common
mapping system and protocols are expected output from WG. How about
something like: "Define and develop a common mapping system, control
plane, and related protocol that provide a common solution for
identifier/locator protocols that map identifiers to locators, as well
as network virtualization protocols that map virtual to physical
addresses"

Fine with me.

Let's poll the list for consensus on this.

Thanks
Padma

Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email