IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt - WG Adoption and IPR call (9/27 to 10/11/2022)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Sat, 08 October 2022 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4622C152563 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 02:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g2c7GN7M-6Ku for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 02:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (mail-m121145.qiye.163.com [115.236.121.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C81FC1524D9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 767C1800082; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 17:32:02 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
Cc: "'Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)'" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
References: <BYAPR08MB4872EEE329BDDDCC0F387B17B3559@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR08MB4872EEE329BDDDCC0F387B17B3559@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 17:32:02 +0800
Message-ID: <0d7901d8daf8$d2ab5ce0$780216a0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D7A_01D8DB3B.E0CFAE50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJqpQZQnNzMeyz1N2oZ6zvpxyEirazgpYzA
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkZTE8aVhhKTkNPSkxMQ09CHlUTARMWGhIXJB QOD1lXWRgSC1lBWUlKQlVKT0lVTUJVTE5ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpKS0hKQ1VKS0tVS1kG
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6PhQ6ETo*Aj0fKkxIOBYrERYo KwgKCk1VSlVKTU1OSUlKTklIS09KVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUpLS09JNwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a83b6eff49ab03akuuu767c1800082
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/26bH_Y1SJew0G1jmp7Axmc9PHtk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt - WG Adoption and IPR call (9/27 to 10/11/2022)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:32:12 -0000

Hi, All:

 

Support for its adoption.

 

One comments for the current contents of the draft:

Should the default behavior of RR be also constrained by the Node Targets
that associated with the BGP Update?  That is to say, if there is no special
configurable policy, the RR should check the Node Targets; if there is no
other Node Targets, then it can reflect the Update to all its peers.

Such approach will be consistent with the behavior of ASBR.

 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

From: idr-bounces@ietf.org <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 1:30 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
<gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Subject: [Idr] draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt - WG Adoption and
IPR call (9/27 to 10/11/2022)

 

This begins a 2 week WG adoption and IPR call for
draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm-05.txt. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-idr-node-target-ext-comm/

 

The authors should respond to this email with an IPR statement. 

 

The WG should consider in their discussion: 

1) Will this new  transitive extended community help 

in operational networks? 

 

2) What conflicts does this new Extended Community have

with other functions in general BGP route distribution or 

VPNs (EVPN, IPVPN)? 

 

3) do you have any concern about the text in the draft? 

 

Cheerily, Sue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email