Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

I was one of the original two supporters, but will reaffirm my support 
of it as WG item and I believe it is a "no-brainer".  I'll go further 
and say it provides important clarifications that need to be said 
authoritatively preferably by this WG or maybe GROW.

I'd agree that with one good round of comments and a revision 
incorporating them, then it is probably ready to go.

On 7/1/13 14:46 , John G. Scudder wrote:
> Folks,
>
> On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of
> draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response --
> two supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to
> declare "WG consensus" or much of anything else.
>
> A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the draft:
> It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be careful
> with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and useful to
> document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not bothering to
> say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't demand much work
> from the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is -- unless of
> course we're wrong and there's controversy about the draft.
>
> So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In particular, if
> you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for
> the WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might make
> an exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".
>
> Thanks!
>
> --John and Sue
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================