IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> Mon, 01 July 2013 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7864221F9C95 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1q03k8aP-nnu for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B6F21F9C96 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7fc36d0000032ea-d9-51d1ebbaebe1
Received: from EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.78]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0C.3C.13034.ABBE1D15; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:51:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC002.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:51:05 -0400
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document
Thread-Index: AQHOdpO9n0Q4m4htXU2ZEXYl5IFAXplQGfAA
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:51:04 +0000
Message-ID: <60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748393C5FCF@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4B5C8A63-E550-4C49-BE4B-F169A78CF023@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_60DEDD93F5E54B4AB55647B8B6C748393C5FCFeusaamb109ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPn+6u1xcDDZ5uEbV4dfsZk8XMG19Z HZg8liz5yeRxvekqewBTFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGhifRBR9VK/pfb2BrYFym0MXIySEhYCKx pn01G4QtJnHh3nogm4tDSOAoo8TTr3vZQRJCAssYJQ4cjgax2QQMJP5/O84CYosIuEt0398E ViMsECzxfeJpVoh4iMTp31uhbCOJJR3fmEBsFgEViQfn24B6OTh4Bbwlrj9yADE5Bewl5k7n AalgBDrh+6k1YNXMAuISt57MZ4I4TUBiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx//AposK6Em0HTvDDhFXlvg+5xEL RG++xP/Fv8F6eQUEJU7OfMIygVFkFpKxs5CUzUJSBhHXkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2YY+8yBx1C9 1hIzjjUxIatZwMixipGjtDi1LDfdyGATIzCejkmw6e5g3PPS8hCjNAeLkjjvKr0zgUIC6Ykl qdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYjcR4HHhnfTXsPGv+RyrhSZtM3eqJWQ/7Mr+tvHj4eGzQ ZS6naz8luFPvmnw988F7To3Scc7vC6PaV7jrSi47vUkqi/nDeeNJM3b4O7zMvO95MsXbSr7k 7sRZVznZjmuLH2+O//JH+rrZWRMOK4umGWxFezeU7Ql6KRcvoP5Dcv6q/11Ld0a3KbEUZyQa ajEXFScCABSiPHh1AgAA
Subject: Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:51:14 -0000

Support/no-brainer

Cheers,
Jeff

From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net<mailto:jgs@juniper.net>>
Date: Monday, July 1, 2013 12:46 PM
To: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

Folks,

On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response -- two supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to declare "WG consensus" or much of anything else.

A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the draft: It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be careful with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and useful to document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not bothering to say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't demand much work from the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is -- unless of course we're wrong and there's controversy about the draft.

So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In particular, if you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for the WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might make an exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".

Thanks!

--John and Sue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email