Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

    In favor.

.as

On 7/1/13 8:46 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> Folks,
>
> On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of
> draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response --
> two supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to
> declare "WG consensus" or much of anything else.
>
> A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the draft:
> It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be
> careful with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and
> useful to document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not
> bothering to say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't
> demand much work from the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is
> -- unless of course we're wrong and there's controversy about the draft.
>
> So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In particular, if
> you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for
> the WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might
> make an exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".
>
> Thanks!
>
> --John and Sue
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr