Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

Support.

Russ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> James Moulton
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 8:21 AM
> Cc: idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG
> document
> 
> In favor,  Jim Moulton
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net
> <mailto:aservin@lacnic.net> > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 	    In favor.
> 
> 	.as
> 
> 
> 	On 7/1/13 8:46 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> 
> 
> 		Folks,
> 
> 		On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of draft-
> jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response -- two
> supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to declare
"WG
> consensus" or much of anything else.
> 
> 		A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the
> draft: It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be
careful
> with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and useful to
> document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not bothering to
> say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't demand much work from
> the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is -- unless of course we're
> wrong and there's controversy about the draft.
> 
> 		So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In
particular,
> if you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for
the
> WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might make an
> exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".
> 
> 		Thanks!
> 
> 		--John and Sue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 		Idr mailing list
> 		Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
> 		https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
> 
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	Idr mailing list
> 	Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> 
> 
> 