Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

In favor,  Jim Moulton

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> wrote:

>
>     In favor.
>
> .as
>
>
> On 7/1/13 8:46 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>  On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of
> draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response -- two
> supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to declare "WG
> consensus" or much of anything else.
>
>  A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the draft:
> It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be careful
> with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and useful to
> document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not bothering to
> say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't demand much work from
> the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is -- unless of course we're
> wrong and there's controversy about the draft.
>
>  So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In particular, if
> you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for the
> WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might make an
> exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".
>
>  Thanks!
>
>  --John and Sue
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing listIdr@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>