Re: [Idr] Second Try: draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations as WG document

["John G. Scudder" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks to those who took the time to respond. The document is adopted as an IDR WG draft. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-idr-

Thanks,

--John

On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:46 PM, John G. Scudder <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> On May 29 the authors requested WG adoption of draft-jhjm-idr-last-as-reservations-00. There was not much response -- two supportive replies, not counting authors. This is not enough to declare "WG consensus" or much of anything else.
> 
> A short summary for those who aren't familiar with the draft: It basically says "the last ASNs are already reserved, please be careful with them". This seems to the chairs to be obviously true and useful to document, but maybe it's SO obvious that WG members are not bothering to say anything. It also seems to us that this doesn't demand much work from the WG and is almost ready for publication as-is -- unless of course we're wrong and there's controversy about the draft.
> 
> So let's try this again. Please do reply, by July 8. In particular, if you feel that we are mistaken and the draft is NOT a "no-brainer" for the WG, you should say that because in this specific case, we might make an exception and apply the rule "silence gives consent".
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --John and Sue
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr