Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 26 September 2006 17:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSGiK-0000Ow-6v; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:27:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSGiJ-0000OM-BO for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:27:23 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSGiI-0007oG-2b for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:27:23 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2006 10:27:21 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,221,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="444254354:sNHT34998200"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8QHRLIe018092; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:21 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k8QHRKQV020106; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:20 -0700
Received: from [10.32.244.222] ([10.32.244.222]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200609261122.k8QBMDD9000192@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
References: <200609261122.k8QBMDD9000192@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <2253DBB7-88CD-4E44-B515-58FDC129541F@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:19 -0700
To: curtis@occnc.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2006 17:27:20.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[055853A0:01C6E191]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=325; t=1159291641; x=1160155641; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Ieprep]=20proposed=20charter=20; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DXlha+2V2j/Iu9KwlFByl8AiNV0c=3D; b=WsUp9aoNVvF/GdZGUM9ZI9R/iWONu5Z5FazlZZuNkTn3sG4soxMQz9PQ1nivKBRtAjvQU3qm Tna52PudkbgqrPPWk2LyM665MD0Pf+j7fqAtZLiZ7tGzC7xPDqkUgJRQ;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4.cisco.com; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Cc: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
or whether drop priority even makes sense operationally, which it doesn't. On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > For example, it is important > to know how many priority/preemption values there will be and whether > each priority requires three drop preferences as required by an AF > service. _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- [Ieprep] liason & the 5 priorities ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter (Implementation) Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities Curtis Villamizar
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter (Implementation) Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels ken carlberg
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- RE: [Ieprep] proposed charter GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] proposed charter Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- ETS applicability, was Re: [Ieprep] proposed char… ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Rex Buddenberg