Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels
Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Tue, 26 September 2006 13:44 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSDEw-0004Y8-60; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSDEu-0004Y3-Iu for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:48 -0400
Received: from amer-mta07.csc.com ([20.137.52.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSDEt-00020w-CQ for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:48 -0400
Received: from amer-gw09.csc.com (amer-gw09.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta07.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k8QDif9b008586; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:45 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <200609260521.k8Q5LdcQ097727@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels
To: curtis@occnc.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OFBAA95066.05652C8C-ON852571F5.004A9C8A-852571F5.004B6690@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:40 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 09/26/2006 09:43:33 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
As RFC 4412 makes perfectly clear, the RPH serves a dual role of signalling priority across an IP network (e.g. from an originating circuit switched access network to a terminating circuit switched access network) as well as signalling priority within the IP network. For each of the namespaces described in RFC 4412, the number of priority values (5 in most cases, 6 in one) is driven by the former role, based on the number of priority values in use, or being considered, in the access network priority scheme. The issue of how many priority levels to differentiate WITHIN the IP network is an issue currently being addressed by vendors and providers. Janet Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> wrote on 09/26/2006 01:21:39 AM: > > As long as the number of priority/preemption classes remains too open > ended, the mapping onto DSCP and Diffserv-TE remains uncertain. For > example, there has to be a strong technical justification for five > priority classes, not just "because ITU specified five" before there > is much of a chance for a set of new DSCP values to be assigned as > anything other than experimental. > > _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- [Ieprep] liason & the 5 priorities ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter (Implementation) Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities Curtis Villamizar
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter (Implementation) Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels ken carlberg
- [Ieprep] Re: liason & the 5 priorities Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter 5 priority levels Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- RE: [Ieprep] proposed charter GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] proposed charter Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- ETS applicability, was Re: [Ieprep] proposed char… ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter Rex Buddenberg