Re: Pending requests

Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <everson@evertype.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF3F7C5667 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:34:09 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmXSU9VOs4VJ for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:34:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from pechora3.lax.icann.org (pechora3.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:73]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D467C5665 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:34:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from si-002-i158.relay.mailchannels.net (si-002-i158.relay.mailchannels.net [108.178.49.170]) by pechora3.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAQHXhtC027832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:34:05 GMT
X-Sender-Id: letshost|x-authuser|everson+evertype.com@lh19.dnsireland.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C20D120365 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lh19.dnsireland.com (ip-10-237-13-110.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.237.13.110]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7A6301200BC for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: letshost|x-authuser|everson+evertype.com@lh19.dnsireland.com
Received: from lh19.dnsireland.com (lh19.dnsireland.com [10.123.73.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.5.5); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:41 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: letshost|x-authuser|everson+evertype.com@lh19.dnsireland.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: letshost
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1448559220058:721030526
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1448559220057
Received: from [37.228.247.168] (port=45012 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by lh19.dnsireland.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <everson@evertype.com>) id 1a20QI-0004aG-5W for ietf-languages@iana.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Subject: Re: Pending requests
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
In-Reply-To: <D27CA94F.33F15%kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:36 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2EEC446E-5DAD-45E5-A463-245F9BCE949A@evertype.com>
References: <D27CA94F.33F15%kent.karlsson14@telia.com>
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
X-AuthUser: everson+evertype.com@lh19.dnsireland.com
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.73]); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:34:09 -0000

This is a relatively novel and relatively unknown scheme, and is about speaker competence and confidence, not about classification of textual content. A given text may be understood at a B1 or C2 level, but the text would be the same. I would not favour this approach. 

> On 26 Nov 2015, at 11:19, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@telia.com> wrote:
> 
> BUT, I would prefer a scheme based on CEFR
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_European_Framework_of_Reference_for_Languages#Common_reference_levels,
> http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf).

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/