IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Pending requests

David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 04:16 UTC

Return-Path: <prosfilaes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F007C5642 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:16:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRUX2P2t6FzN for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:16:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from pechora3.lax.icann.org (pechora3.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:73]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48D17C5640 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:16:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) by pechora3.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAQ4G017008160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 04:16:20 GMT
Received: by obbbj7 with SMTP id bj7so54391370obb.1 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:15:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=RIBXIf8MPyKHgF3zofAsWDMBufhrdfuy+tqqoJwSymI=; b=YBlcPo3E26b/5YQco0ROfZeumT/KJWPgLPdZ1fTcc+1fBXUKSZdYzbv11Gwpvq9Y8q 96uSttLeXmNvid/YX9umYxcp3E9BuORFQAzVF6tFBLHpuLjy+g22QEriTwnMsr8MEN4Q 3Hx2zWfjsf1cvZOqeA6/Qm4Jkq5PRssDY+lFVmwxv/UNwctc0ow5uZe4WrNIyxEcgsQR yAozdRSAbppSLx3bYEYqyzT5Y4l4IoUQc2OcA+m8q4aSaZY6mZ+r254OxHTh1k8mH2P0 92+gc4hkbnYNcKjU6MfE3hApsjssom6DA5oegMPxOsPh+PEcZf0txMJh81AFq2UFHblk q0CA==
X-Received: by 10.182.148.164 with SMTP id tt4mr14140860obb.25.1448511359830; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:15:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20151125130106.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.1d2c2e35b3.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> <SN1PR0301MB2045D820CDBB26769AD596F982050@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <D7F30517-305C-47D5-A548-A51579917E0C@evertype.com> <SN1PR0301MB20453474FC0465A133D6122F82050@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <901133C7-F522-4634-BF38-7973EDBA8C35@evertype.com> <SN1PR0301MB2045B64E0B3E54C585D4F97982040@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB2045B64E0B3E54C585D4F97982040@SN1PR0301MB2045.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 04:15:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMZ=zj4Wwenk+bT3mowXU4JSvS_XnU6-ot3zQUGUB9b5eO4s1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pending requests
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d05080e524d052569d51d"
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora3.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:73]); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 04:16:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 04:16:25 -0000

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:16 PM Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> IMO that's different than a dialect such as en-US and en-GB.
>

There's a large number of formalized subsets of languages, which are
generally characterized by being fully intelligible to speakers of the
language of which they are a subset of. Even if they aren't exactly
dialects, I don't see the point in labeling them as separate languages and
trying to get them into ISO 693-3 instead of just tagging them here.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email