Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 17 April 2015 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8281B2DC1 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydJ3D7eQOqSY for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4E71B2DC5 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3HEl7jO031373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:12 -0700
Message-ID: <55311CE9.9040003@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:05 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>
References: <552FCC84.6040305@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCYuEGRidB1D=SGA0qxk+SuX6+HyqToYDmqQVmpBskWrw@mail.gmail.com>, <5530329E.4060608@dcrocker.net> <01F784DA-5FD5-4D1F-8613-C2E668EDA765@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <01F784DA-5FD5-4D1F-8613-C2E668EDA765@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/XFdpQnBigzJMkPJVBt4oUe7Jjwc>
Cc: "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:47:15 -0000

On 4/16/2015 3:33 PM, Robin Wilton wrote:
> I don't know of an official IETF finite on, but this is the one the Internet Society has been using for a while, and I think it's still good:
> 
> http://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2013/12/language-privacy


Thanks. That definition looks quite reasonable.

Now to get the IETF to settle on it...

Note that the definition isn't all that complicated, but does cover the
essential issue that discussions of privacy usually entail, specifically
control over disclosure.  Also note that that is quite a useful
distinction from "confidentiality" and its usual embodiment of "encryption".

Failure to adopt a working definition for a key construct tends to
reflect a failure to build a solid, shared foundation for the topic of
interest.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net