IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?

Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org> Thu, 16 April 2015 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wilton@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AC21B3803 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKs4SRzstFpD for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0629.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8211B3801 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO2PR0601MB0983.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (0.160.7.28) by CO2PR0601MB0984.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (0.160.8.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.136.25; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:02 +0000
Received: from CO2PR0601MB0983.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([0.160.7.28]) by CO2PR0601MB0983.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([0.160.7.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0136.026; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:02 +0000
From: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Thread-Topic: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?
Thread-Index: AQHQeHhWsapnax08r0qQT1wnKkxEHJ1QMoAAgAAHKPg=
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:02 +0000
Message-ID: <01F784DA-5FD5-4D1F-8613-C2E668EDA765@isoc.org>
References: <552FCC84.6040305@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCYuEGRidB1D=SGA0qxk+SuX6+HyqToYDmqQVmpBskWrw@mail.gmail.com>, <5530329E.4060608@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <5530329E.4060608@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: bbiw.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [94.174.34.240]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO2PR0601MB0984;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR0601MB0984E7F326A858D4F600F37ABFE40@CO2PR0601MB0984.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(479174004)(24454002)(377454003)(51704005)(86362001)(2501003)(83716003)(77156002)(40100003)(46102003)(2656002)(62966003)(15975445007)(99286002)(2351001)(87936001)(102836002)(110136001)(1720100001)(54356999)(50986999)(36756003)(92566002)(106116001)(76176999)(19580405001)(66066001)(82746002)(19580395003)(2900100001)(33656002)(2950100001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR0601MB0984; H:CO2PR0601MB0983.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:CO2PR0601MB0984; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO2PR0601MB0984;
x-forefront-prvs: 0548586081
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Apr 2015 22:33:02.5263 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 89f84dfb-7285-4810-bc4d-8b9b5794554f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR0601MB0984
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/iD4ozWlpWxmNs64Ag3a-hYMjawg>
Cc: "ietf-privacy@ietf.org" <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] Is there an official working definition for Privacy Online?
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:33:24 -0000

I don't know of an official IETF finite on, but this is the one the Internet Society has been using for a while, and I think it's still good:

http://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2013/12/language-privacy

Robin Wilton

Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy

On 16 Apr 2015, at 23:07, "Dave Crocker" <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 4/16/2015 12:05 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> 
>> RFC 6973 (found, among other places at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973.txt) has an extensive terminology
>> section and review of the issues.  You may find it a useful place to start.
> 
> 
> Except that it does not define privacy.
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-privacy mailing list
> ietf-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email