Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 061B61ACEC2; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32F11ACE44 for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjwsKJeyBlIL for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A531ACE45 for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com ([66.159.242.17]:11367) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <ned.freed@mrochek.com>) id 1Yi66X-0006qZ-9o for draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:02:38 -0700
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PKSSNINA1S00JYH4@mauve.mrochek.com> for draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1429037850; bh=QI4NKDzCYl2fOwjOV6RngIJNyVcedG7Goij9rGRBtOM=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To; b=Ul8h0R5v+AObztUfhxaxCNS0RRnEjtp87OAQX1JT3DvqFVOguVJuhlvefgwgFrTwv UuUhRVXTEuTB9Ua+OF6qfQJ3R7qgiUFJUqqtmZg9K79a2wUEJnQVxf0TL6jGTjdyu8 MEehGiimw58mu8HrQ6qoWVGecYH8YIkvdcVoQR6c=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PKJBBQ6BO00000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:53:52 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:59:04 +0000" <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org>
To: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 66.159.242.17
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150414190238.75A531ACE45@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:02:38 -0700
Resent-From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools/1Xa7mP_qQYiXfhgeXagN-mXF1dg>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/80s8vI9Y9wFJmrwx3w_LAGPl9V0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:10:33 -0700
Cc: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, tony@att.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:04:57 -0000

No doubt I'm missing something obvious, but where do I see this comments
on the new datatracker?

				Ned


> IESG:

> IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> IANA Actions - YES

> 1) A question posted in the tracker and in the IANA Last Call comments.

> 2) Expert review is depended on a clarification to the question.

 
> Thank you,

> Pearl Liang
> ICANN



> On Mon Apr 06 15:53:25 2015, iesg-secretary@ietf.org wrote:
> > Evaluation for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> can be found at
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-smtp-521code/
> >
> > Last call to expire on: 2015-04-02 00:00 PDT
> >
> >
> > Please return the full line with your position.
> >
> > Yes  No-Objection  Discuss  Abstain
> > Barry Leiba          [ X ]     [   ]      [   ]    [   ]
> >
> >
> > Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
> >
> > DISCUSSES AND COMMENTS
> > ======================
> >
> > ---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval ---
> > From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> > Subject: Protocol Action: 'SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes' to Proposed
> > Standard (draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt)
> >
> > The IESG has approved the following document:
> > - 'SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes'
> >   (draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt) as Proposed Standard
> >
> > This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of
> > an
> > IETF Working Group.
> >
> > The IESG contact person is Barry Leiba.
> >
> > A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-smtp-521code/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Technical Summary
> >
> > This memo defines two Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) reply
> > codes, 521 and 556.  The 521 code was originally described in an
> > Experimental RFC in 1995 and is in wide use, but has not previously
> > been formally incorporated into SMTP.  The 556 code was created for
> > RFC-nullMX.  These codes are used to indicate that an Internet host
> > does not accept incoming mail at all (not just under particular
> > circumstances).
> >
> > This is presented for publication as a Proposed Standard, as it adds
> > codes
> > to RFC 5321, which is already standards track.
> >
> >
> > Review and Consensus
> >
> > This document came out of discussions on both the apps discuss and
> > ietf-smtp
> > mailing lists about (1) moving RFC 1846 to the standards track, and
> > (2) the
> > nullMX idea. There was wide-spread agreement on both of those efforts,
> > including accepting nullMX as an APPS WG document.
> >
> > The decision to create this document was mostly due to administrative
> > ease so
> > that there was only one document updating RFC 5321 instead of two. The
> > nullMX document was then rewritten to point to this document. (The
> > nullMX
> > document has been through 10 revisions since becoming an APPS WG
> > document.)
> >
> > There is widespread implementation of both of these return codes.
> >
> >
> > Personnel
> >
> > Tony Hansen is the Document Shepherd. Barry Leiba is the responsible
> > Area Director. This document is an individual submission.

> _______________________________________________
> ietf-smtp mailing list
> ietf-smtp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp