IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C07D21B2A94; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54801B2A90 for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ukdxibEKejrW for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B161B2A8F for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com ([70.88.254.51]:63858) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Yi7bL-00027o-IC for draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:32 -0700
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Yi7b5-0001Ld-9j; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:38:15 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:38:10 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <44C432375C9136C810476885@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <01PKSTIGLHJI0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org> <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAC4RtVDLOS5o41F5m-GXKaMwUZB90ga5GL+nqofn6X7vTE78yg@mail.gmail.com> <01PKSTIGLHJI0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.88.254.51
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150414203833.05B161B2A8F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:38:33 -0700
Resent-From: john-ietf@jck.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools/GYISdFH6FhPMst2VHMAXCUBF07E>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/bysyM-bvsflam2Gs0A9Y26-ojoQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:16:55 -0700
Cc: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>, draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:38:34 -0000


--On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:21 -0700 Ned Freed
<ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:

>> > No doubt I'm missing something obvious, but where do I see
>> > this comments on the new datatracker?
> 
>> In the "History" tab.  Trouble is that the IANA review isn't
>> well marked (never has been).
> 
> So today's message refers to the comments made two weeks ago?
> 
> This seems odd, but OK.

Ned (and others),

That aside, the real issue here is that someone needs to check
the extended code and either reassure IANA that it is correct
(and that the document should say "register the code") or tell
them (and me) that I made a typographical or transcription
error.  As I've told Barry and a few others, my IETF time is
completely tied up with URNBIS, some closely-related issues
(including whether or note the URI scheme registration document
has important side-effects), and some IAB-related stuff.   If
I'm not actually on travel, I would have time to patch some text
into the otherwise-ready-to-go -06 of this document, but not the
bandwidth to study the extended codes.  If someone who is closer
to them than I am could do that, we could probably get this
document cleared rather than wondering what is happening with it.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email