Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 22:06 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6281A6FEF; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSaczG_fT9Xs; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB5C1A6F3A; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Yi8xl-0001ad-HA; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:05:45 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:05:40 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
Message-ID: <F29FE47D27B6DACFA8BD1C6B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCZJjC2Zxd3OVpYifDJD=Zp7jqAyqYZXxiuNbdr-m5Ayg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org> <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAC4RtVDLOS5o41F5m-GXKaMwUZB90ga5GL+nqofn6X7vTE78yg@mail.gmail.com> <01PKSTIGLHJI0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <44C432375C9136C810476885@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <552D8709.1000704@att.com> <CAC4RtVCZJjC2Zxd3OVpYifDJD=Zp7jqAyqYZXxiuNbdr-m5Ayg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/KTZWbjAH7kWtQu69ymo78UhxjWw>
Cc: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>, draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:06:01 -0000
Ok. I've also just changed my address on the ietf-smtp list to allow me to post to that list as well as draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all from the same address. I consider Tony's "transcription error" to be definitive unless someone speaks up RSN. Pearl, that means "X.10.1" should indeed be "X.1.10". Unless someone (particularly Barry) objects within the next couple of hours, I will post draft-klensin-smtp-521code-06, which reflects this change and other changes that seem to be agreed upon, later this evening or early tomorrow. The major change is a rewrite to the discussion of code 556 to make the client and server relationships more clear as discussed on-list earlier. john --On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 17:35 -0400 Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > I'm tired of having to approve every post for having "implicit > destination", so please reply to this one if there's further > discussion; I've added the ietf-smtp list explicitly. > > Barry > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> > wrote: >> John, you made a transcription error. The code should be >> X.1.10. >> >> In draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10, it's listed as 5.1.TBD, and >> IANA assigned a 10 to the TBD. >> >> Tony >> >> >> On 4/14/15 4:38 PM, John C Klensin wrote: >>> >>> >>> --On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:21 -0700 Ned Freed >>> <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> No doubt I'm missing something obvious, but where do I see >>>>>> this comments on the new datatracker? >>>>> >>>>> In the "History" tab. Trouble is that the IANA review >>>>> isn't well marked (never has been). >>>> >>>> So today's message refers to the comments made two weeks >>>> ago? >>>> >>>> This seems odd, but OK. >>> >>> Ned (and others), >>> >>> That aside, the real issue here is that someone needs to >>> check the extended code and either reassure IANA that it is >>> correct (and that the document should say "register the >>> code") or tell them (and me) that I made a typographical or >>> transcription error. As I've told Barry and a few others, >>> my IETF time is completely tied up with URNBIS, some >>> closely-related issues (including whether or note the URI >>> scheme registration document has important side-effects), >>> and some IAB-related stuff. If I'm not actually on travel, >>> I would have time to patch some text into the >>> otherwise-ready-to-go -06 of this document, but not the >>> bandwidth to study the extended codes. If someone who is >>> closer to them than I am could do that, we could probably >>> get this document cleared rather than wondering what is >>> happening with it. >>> >>> john >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ietf-smtp mailing list >> ietf-smtp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-kle… Pearl Liang via RT
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Ned Freed
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818883] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Tony Hansen
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818899] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818897] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT