[ietf-smtp] [IANA #818899] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
"Pearl Liang via RT" <drafts-eval@iana.org> Wed, 15 April 2015 16:53 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9BE901B2E05; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816E11B2DF7 for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jJlabnnUq1P for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4661B2DEA for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([192.0.33.81]:39497 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1YiQZ1-0001r1-Kk for draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:24 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3FGr8sj032089; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:53:08 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2EEB5C207E8; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: Nobody
From: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-818899@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org> <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-17638-1429116787-1255.818899-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #818899
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:53:08 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.0.33.81
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150415165324.3A4661B2DEA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:53:24 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools/qPrDOPVsZjc2vos6Dt-s7RSpk58>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Ke5uSQr2C0kcvhxsoEdVxtTaHho>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:11:20 -0700
Cc: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, tony@att.com, ned.freed@mrochek.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818899] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-eval@iana.org
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:53:26 -0000
Ned, On Tue Apr 14 20:57:30 2015, ned.freed@mrochek.com wrote: > No doubt I'm missing something obvious, but where do I see this comments > on the new datatracker? > We in general do not send our Evaluation comments to the datatracker. We normally refer to the Last Call comments logged in the tracker. Thanks, ~pl > Ned > > > > IESG: > > > IANA NOT OK. Comments in tracker > > IANA Actions - YES > > > 1) A question posted in the tracker and in the IANA Last Call comments. > > > 2) Expert review is depended on a clarification to the question. > > > > Thank you, > > > Pearl Liang > > ICANN > > > > > On Mon Apr 06 15:53:25 2015, iesg-secretary@ietf.org wrote: > > > Evaluation for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> can be found at > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-smtp-521code/ > > > > > > Last call to expire on: 2015-04-02 00:00 PDT > > > > > > > > > Please return the full line with your position. > > > > > > Yes No-Objection Discuss Abstain > > > Barry Leiba [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ] > > > > > > > > > Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass. > > > > > > DISCUSSES AND COMMENTS > > > ====================== > > > > > > ---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval --- > > > From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > > > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > > > Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > > > Subject: Protocol Action: 'SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes' to Proposed > > > Standard (draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt) > > > > > > The IESG has approved the following document: > > > - 'SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes' > > > (draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt) as Proposed Standard > > > > > > This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of > > > an > > > IETF Working Group. > > > > > > The IESG contact person is Barry Leiba. > > > > > > A URL of this Internet Draft is: > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-smtp-521code/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Technical Summary > > > > > > This memo defines two Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) reply > > > codes, 521 and 556. The 521 code was originally described in an > > > Experimental RFC in 1995 and is in wide use, but has not previously > > > been formally incorporated into SMTP. The 556 code was created for > > > RFC-nullMX. These codes are used to indicate that an Internet host > > > does not accept incoming mail at all (not just under particular > > > circumstances). > > > > > > This is presented for publication as a Proposed Standard, as it adds > > > codes > > > to RFC 5321, which is already standards track. > > > > > > > > > Review and Consensus > > > > > > This document came out of discussions on both the apps discuss and > > > ietf-smtp > > > mailing lists about (1) moving RFC 1846 to the standards track, and > > > (2) the > > > nullMX idea. There was wide-spread agreement on both of those efforts, > > > including accepting nullMX as an APPS WG document. > > > > > > The decision to create this document was mostly due to administrative > > > ease so > > > that there was only one document updating RFC 5321 instead of two. The > > > nullMX document was then rewritten to point to this document. (The > > > nullMX > > > document has been through 10 revisions since becoming an APPS WG > > > document.) > > > > > > There is widespread implementation of both of these return codes. > > > > > > > > > Personnel > > > > > > Tony Hansen is the Document Shepherd. Barry Leiba is the responsible > > > Area Director. This document is an individual submission. > > > _______________________________________________ > > ietf-smtp mailing list > > ietf-smtp@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp >
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft-kle… Pearl Liang via RT
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Ned Freed
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818883] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Tony Hansen
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #817403] Evaluation: <draft… John C Klensin
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818899] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT
- [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818897] Re: Evaluation: <draft… Pearl Liang via RT