[ietf-smtp] [IANA #818883] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard

"Pearl Liang via RT" <drafts-eval@iana.org> Tue, 14 April 2015 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E55061ACF56; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C971AD05E for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sz7-fPwTM5JX for <xfilter-draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2091ACF57 for <draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([192.0.33.81]:58498 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1Yi72m-0007Mt-Az for draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:49 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3EK2TNp031486; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:02:29 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 98AC3C207C3; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: Nobody
From: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDLOS5o41F5m-GXKaMwUZB90ga5GL+nqofn6X7vTE78yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-818883@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org> <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAC4RtVDLOS5o41F5m-GXKaMwUZB90ga5GL+nqofn6X7vTE78yg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-15237-1429041749-1262.818883-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #818883
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:02:29 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.0.33.81
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150414200249.DD2091ACF57@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:49 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools/BvKrTLGHCQUQSsaCcJT0Byt0ol8>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/gX-azOfOozC2pH8VnSOePsa435Y>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:09:57 -0700
Cc: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, tony@att.com, barryleiba@computer.org, ned.freed@mrochek.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818883] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-eval@iana.org
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:02:53 -0000

Hi Barry,


On Tue Apr 14 19:13:20 2015, barryleiba@computer.org wrote:
> > No doubt I'm missing something obvious, but where do I see this comments
> > on the new datatracker?
> 
> In the "History" tab.  Trouble is that the IANA review isn't well
> marked (never has been).
> 

Any suggestions to improve that?  How about to mark our Comments as 
"IANA Comments" in the History tab?

In any case, can you please clarify this?

QUESTION: In the IANA Considerations section, should "X.10.1" actually be "X.1.10," or is the document referring to an entry that will be registered by another document?

Thanks,
~pl