[ietf-smtp] [IANA #818897] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard

"Pearl Liang via RT" <drafts-eval@iana.org> Wed, 15 April 2015 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39391A03B3; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgdE2mK1wDLn; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.lax.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7611A047A; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3FIXsVG006819; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:33:54 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22435C20812; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: pearl.liang
From: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <99F73D7B2129481C52101297@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-818897@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-817403@icann.org> <20150406155254.5191.24318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-20219-1429034344-799.817403-7-0@icann.org> <01PKSSNGSGBK0000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <552D8709.1000704@att.com> <CAC4RtVCZJjC2Zxd3OVpYifDJD=Zp7jqAyqYZXxiuNbdr-m5Ayg@mail.gmail.com> <F29FE47D27B6DACFA8BD1C6B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJJ3Y2qMTirBu6nnHxLUCfyGjNiiNF4m3KOOLqUQLn=j+w@mail.gmail.com> <99F73D7B2129481C52101297@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-16687-1429122833-490.818897-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #818897
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:33:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/mqBF-WZyVcNOk3jQ0eMEt104koo>
Cc: draft-klensin-smtp-521code.all@tools.ietf.org, ned.freed@mrochek.com, ietf-smtp@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, john-ietf@jck.com, tony@att.com, barryleiba@computer.org
Subject: [ietf-smtp] [IANA #818897] Re: Evaluation: <draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-eval@iana.org
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:33:59 -0000

Hi John, et al.

Version 06 has clarified the value.  We are sending this request to the designated
expert for approval.   

Thanks,
~pl

Pearl Liang
ICANN


On Wed Apr 15 11:50:48 2015, john-ietf@jck.com wrote:
> Sorry for delay -- xml2rfc has stopped resolving entity
> references to the bibxml library and I didn't have the energy
> last night to work around it.  Posted now.
> 
>    john
> 
> 
> --On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 18:13 -0400 Barry Leiba
> <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> >> Unless someone (particularly Barry) objects within the next
> >> couple of hours, I will post draft-klensin-smtp-521code-06,
> >> which reflects this change and other changes that seem to be
> >> agreed upon, later this evening or early tomorrow.
> > 
> > No objection from me, clearly.
> 
> 
> 
>